ArticlemBio2025
Will gut, oral, and vaginal microbiota influence the outcome of FET or be influenced by FET? A pilot study.
Article in mBio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Female Reproductive Microbiome: Mechanistic Insights and Bioengineering Perspectives.Biology · 2026Review
- Vaginal microbiota in assisted reproduction: determinants, dynamics, and impact on clinical outcomes.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Comprehensive analysis of metabolic and molecular alterations in the blood of patients with Sjögren's syndrome based on untargeted metabolomics analysis.BMC medical genomics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to examine the specific relationships between gut, oral, and vaginal microbiota and the frozen embryo transfer (FET) process. Patients undergoing fertility treatment who met the inclusion criteria were included in this study. After sampling at three time points, participants were then divided into two groups: the failure group and the success group, based on whether a viable intrauterine pregnancy was confirmed. In this pilot study, we systematically examined changes in the gut, oral, and vaginal microbiota at various stages of the FET process using 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing and investigated their respective associations with FET outcomes. Metabolomics and random forest were used for evaluating the relationship between gut microbiota and metabolites during FET. Our findings indicate that while the gut microbiota underwent the least change throughout FET, it exhibited the greatest differences between success and failure groups. The oral and vaginal microbiota exhibited significant fluctuations. However, the differences in oral microbiota between the success and failure groups changed with the FET process, while the vaginal microbiota did not show any differences. Notably, two key gut genera,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.