ArticleACS nano2025
Self-Accelerating Drops on Silicone-Based Super Liquid-Repellent Surfaces.
Article in ACS nano, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Design of super liquid-repellent surfaces has relied on an interplay between surface topography and surface energy. Perfluoroalkylated materials are often used, but they are environmentally unsustainable and notorious for building up static charge. Therefore, there is a need for understanding the performance of sustainable low surface energy materials with antistatic properties. Here, we explore drop interactions with perfluoroalkyl- and silicone-based surfaces, focusing on three modes of drop-to-surface interactions. The behavior of drops rolling under gravity is compared to those subjected to lateral and normal forces under constant slide (i.e., friction) and detachment (i.e., adhesion) velocities. We demonstrate that a drop's characteristic and dynamic mobility depends on surface chemistry, with sequential drop interactions being particularly affected. By utilizing force-and-charge instruments, we show how rolling drops are primarily governed by adhesion and its associated electrostatic effects, instead of friction. Perfluoroalkylated surfaces continuously accumulate charges, while silicone surfaces rapidly saturate. Consequently, sequentially contacting drops accumulate significant charges on the former while rapidly diminishing on the latter. The drop charge suppressing behavior of silicones enhances drop mobility despite their higher surface energy compared to perfluoroalkyls. Quantum mechanical density functional theory calculations show significant differences in surface charge distributions at the atomic level. Simulations suggest that variations in the lifetimes of surface hydroxyl ions likely drive the markedly different drop charging behaviors. Our findings demonstrate the critical role of surface chemistry and its coupled electrostatics in drop mobility, providing valuable insights for designing environmentally friendly, antistatic, super liquid-repellent surfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.