SynthesisJournal of clinical nursing2026
Effectiveness of Mobile Health-Delivered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.
Synthesis in Journal of clinical nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo determine the treatment effectiveness associated with mobile health-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (mCBT-I) interventions for adults with insomnia and to identify the potential characteristics associated with better treatment outcomes.
designA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) guidelines.
methodsSeven English- and two Chinese-language databases were searched, without restrictions on publication dates, up to July 2024. Reference lists of relevant reviews and grey literature were included in the search. Randomised controlled trials evaluating mCBT-I in adults with insomnia and published in either English or Chinese were included in this meta-analysis. A random-effects model was used for data analysis, accompanied by additional subgroup analyses and meta-regression.
resultsSixteen studies involving 2146 participants were included in this meta-analysis. mCBT-I interventions were associated with significantly reduced insomnia symptoms and improved sleep quality at post intervention, at 1-3-month follow-up, and at 4-6-month follow-up. Interventions that included five components of CBT-I, were delivered for 6 weeks or longer, and were conducted in a group format were linked to better treatment outcomes; the differences in other subgroup categories were not statistically significant. Studies involving participants with comorbid conditions showed a greater effect in reducing insomnia symptoms than those without such participants. In addition, mCBT-I interventions delivered by healthcare professionals resulted in statistically larger effect sizes for improving sleep quality than self-help regimens.
conclusionsThe systematic review and meta-analysis identified the effectiveness of mCBT-I in reducing insomnia symptoms and improving sleep quality and offered practical implications for the development of effective mCBT-I interventions in clinical practice. However, future robust studies are needed to explore the long-term effects of mCBT-I interventions. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution. TRAIL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD: 42023454647.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.