ArticleJournal of neurochemistry2025
Extensive Clinical Flow Cytometric Lymphocyte Phenotyping in Myasthenia Gravis: A Single-Center Study.
Article in Journal of neurochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Extensive Clinical Flow Cytometric Lymphocyte Phenotyping in Myasthenia Gravis: A Single-Center Study.Journal of neurochemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune neurological disease characterized by potentially life-threatening muscular fatiguability. Symptoms are directly linked to autoantibodies targeting postsynaptic receptors of the neuromuscular junction. However, the underlying immunopathogenesis remains to be elucidated. This single-center study aimed to characterize peripheral blood lymphocytes in MG patients and to identify prognostic biomarkers. We retrospectively reanalyzed clinical flow cytometric data on blood B and T cells from 76 incident MG cases, comparing them to healthy individuals of relevant age range. Clinical data was collected from the Swedish MG registry and used for outcome analyses. Flow cytometry analyses were based on standardized panels established by the Human Immunology Project Consortium and included a 10-color T cell panel focused on memory, polarization, and activation states and an 8-color B cell panel that includes memory phenotypes, transitional B cells and plasmablasts. Groupwise comparisons, survival curves, and regression models adjusting for potential confounders were used to assess potential predictors of the primary outcome, minimal disease manifestation within one year. Untreated MG patients had higher frequencies of cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) T cell frequencies compared to healthy individuals of approximately the same age (median 75% vs. 63% in age range 40-59 years and 65% in 60-81 years). High CD4 T cell frequencies (> 75% of total T cells) were associated with lower probability of minimal disease manifestation within one year (35% vs. 67%; log rank p = 0.032). In a multivariable Cox regression model assessing time to minimal disease manifestation, CD4 T cell frequency was an independent risk factor (p = 0.0014). In conclusion, MG patients appear to display an altered CD4 T cell phenotype and frequency of CD4 T cells is a potential prognostic biomarker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.