ArticleActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2025
Assessing Adolescent Involvement in Type 1 Diabetes Treatment: A Scoping Review of Person-Reported Outcome Instruments.
Article in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Choosing diabetes technology in children and adolescents: beyond preference to fit.Diabetologia · 2026Article
- Investigation of the Content Validity, Feasibility, Internal Consistency, and Construct Validity of 5 Patient-Reported Outcome Questions on Patient Involvement in Care Among Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: Multimethods Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThe aim of this study was to identify and map the content, structure, and application of person-reported outcome instruments used to assess the experience of treatment involvement among adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
methodsStudies were identified in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, JSTOR, and MedNar. We included studies that used instruments that assess treatment involvement among adolescents (aged 11-18 years) with type 1 diabetes. All review steps involved two reviewers. Data extraction, charting, and analysis were guided by a template focusing on the content, structure, and application of instruments.
resultsThis scoping review identified 23 instruments used in 52 studies, measuring different kinds of treatment involvement among adolescents with type 1 diabetes, e.g., communication with clinicians, clinicians' commitment, and shared decision-making. Both instrument length and response formats varied across instruments. Some instruments were applicable in adolescents, whereas others were suitable for use in adults.
conclusionThis review details the use of several instruments assessing treatment involvement experiences among adolescents with type 1 diabetes. The findings of this review can guide clinicians and researchers on optimal instrument content, structure, and application to implement a person-centred care practice in paediatric diabetes care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.