ArticleVeterinary dermatology2025
Dermoscopic evaluation of normal canine skin with a handheld dermoscope.
Article in Veterinary dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic Value and Limitations of Dermoscopy in Humans and Animals: A Critical Comparative Analysis.Veterinary dermatology · 2026Pooled it
- Dermoscopic evaluation of normal canine skin with a handheld dermoscope.Veterinary dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDermoscopy is a noninvasive diagnostic tool that provides a magnified view of skin structures. While dermoscopy is described for certain canine dermatological diseases, large-scale studies evaluating normal skin are lacking. HYPOTHESIS/
objectiveThis study aimed to correlate dermoscopic findings with histopathological results in healthy canine skin to enhance understanding of dermoscopic microanatomy and pigmentation patterns. ANIMALS: Healthy, adult, shelter dogs (n = 121). MATERIALS AND
methodsAfter general anaesthesia for prescheduled sterilisation procedures, four regions on each dog were assessed using a handheld dermoscope followed by collecting a biopsy for histopathological investigation. Dermoscopic assessment included skin colour and pattern, presence of scale and blood vessel number. Dermoscopic findings were correlated with histopathological characteristics.
resultsDermoscopy identified grey as the most common skin colour, diffuse as the primary pattern, most commonly mild scale and primarily absent blood vessels. Dermoscopy correlation with histopathological results identified moderate scale as more likely to have hyperkeratosis, and no significant correlation between visualised blood vessels and number of endothelial cells. Furthermore, the dermoscopic colour brown was more likely to have melanin within each epidermal layer, while white was less likely to have melanin within each layer. Despite the lack of gross and dermoscopic inflammation, such as erythema, 53 of 484 sites had histopathological evidence of inflammation, with primarily mild mastocytic and eosinophilic superficial dermatitis. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Dermoscopy can identify characteristics in canine skin that correlate with histopathological results, yet mild inflammation may remain undetected. This correlation better establishes baselines for future studies utilising dermoscopy when assessing dermatological diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.