Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40525454›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2024

Verification of molecular subtyping of bladder cancer in the GUSTO clinical trial.

Jon Griffin, Jenny Down, Lewis A Quayle, Paul R Heath, Ewan A Gibb, Elai Davicioni, Yang Liu, Xin Zhao, Jayne Swain, Dennis Wang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Innovations in biomarker stratification for precision oncology.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Towards biomarker-driven therapies for urothelial carcinoma.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jon Griffin *Department of Histopathology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3969-7637
Jenny Down *Academic Urology Unit, Division of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Lewis A QuayleAcademic Urology Unit, Division of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Paul R HeathSheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Ewan A GibbVeracyte Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Elai DavicioniVeracyte Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Yang LiuVeracyte Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Xin ZhaoVeracyte Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jayne SwainClinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Dennis WangSheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Syed HussainAcademic Oncology Unit, Division of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Simon CrabbSouthampton Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
James Wf CattoAcademic Urology Unit, Division of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
GUSTO Trial Management Group

Funding

Academy of Medical Sciences Professorship APR7\1002Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme 128103NIHR Clinical Lectureship CL-2022-04-004NIHR Research Professorship NIHR300047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The GUSTO clinical trial (Gene expression subtypes of Urothelial carcinoma: Stratified Treatment and Oncological outcomes) uses molecular subtypes to guide neoadjuvant therapies in participants with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Before commencing the GUSTO trial, we needed to determine the reliability of a commercial subtyping platform (Decipher Bladder; Veracyte) when performed in an external trial laboratory as this has not been done previously. Here, we report our pre-trial verification of the TCGA molecular subtyping model using gene expression profiling. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of MIBC were used for gene expression subtyping by gene expression microarrays. Intra- and inter-laboratory technical reproducibilities, together with quality control of laboratory and bioinformatics processes, were assessed. Eighteen samples underwent analysis. RNA of sufficient quality and quantity was successfully extracted from all samples. All subtypes were represented in the cohort. Each sample was subtyped twice in our laboratory and once in a separate reference laboratory. No clinically significant discordance in subtype occurred between intra- or inter-laboratory replicates. Examination of sample histopathology showed variability of morphological appearances within and between subtypes. Overall, these results show that molecular subtyping by gene expression profiling is reproducible, robust and suitable for use in the GUSTO clinical trial.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Transitional CellGene Expression ProfilingUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMaleOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkers, Tumorgene expression subtypesmolecular pathologyurothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID40525454
PMCPMC10835016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.