Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40525417›Full record

SynthesisCurrent cardiology reviews2025

The use of Veno-arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for Acute High Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review.

Rohit Munagala, Humail Patel, Pranav Sathe, Avneet Singh, Mangala Narasimhan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current cardiology reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rohit MunagalaDepartment of Internal Medicine, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY, 11030, United States of America.
Humail PatelDepartment of Internal Medicine, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY, 11030, United States of America.
Pranav SatheDepartment of Internal Medicine, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY, 11030, United States of America.
Avneet SinghLong Island Jewish Medical Center, Northwell Cardiovascular Institute, Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY, 11040, United States of America.
Mangala NarasimhanDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY, 11030, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPulmonary embolism (PE) associated with hemodynamic compromise, termed high-risk or massive acute PE (MAPE), is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Despite advancements in procedural techniques and an increase in the availability of advanced therapies, the outcomes associated with high-risk PE remain poor. Here, we review the literature surrounding the use of Veno-arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VAECMO), primarily as a bridging therapy, in patients presenting with high-risk pulmonary embolism.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis utilizing PubMed/MEDLINE from database inception until March 2024. The terms "high-risk PE", "massive PE" and "MAPE" were paired with "VA-ECMO", "bridge therapy" and "solo therapy" along with related terms to find and analyze relevant studies. The primary outcome assessed was in-hospital mortality.

resultsMost comparative studies involved assessing VA-ECMO's utility as solo therapy vs as a bridge to advanced therapy. Out of the data involving VA-ECMO as solo therapy, most showed definite survival benefit in subset of populations with VA-ECMO's role being varied by age and cardiac arrest presence. A portion of studies were notable for finding no difference in outcomes; however no major retrospective determined negative effect of VA-ECMO. In head-to-head studies as a bridge, studies from multiple centers highlighted VA-ECMO's role in stabilizing and improving survival in massive PE prior to systemic or catheter directed thrombolysis. Follow-up studies were limited, however one retrospective showed 30-day mortality of 31% and the 1-year mortality of 54% post PERT call. Follow-up echocardiograms performed on survivors between 30-365 days from Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT) activation interestingly all had normal Right Ventricular (RV) size and function with mild to no tricuspid regurgitation.

conclusionMost major literature supports the use of VA-ECMO as either solo therapy or a bridge to advanced therapy in MAPE with additional shock or cardiac arrest. However, further studies are needed to develop society guidelines for regular initiation in cases of MAPE.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationPulmonary EmbolismAcute DiseaseHospital MortalityHumansbridge therapyhypoxiaPulmonary embolismsolo therapythrombolysisveno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Identifiers

PMID40525417
PMCPMC12180365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.