ArticleCirculation2025
Family Screening in Relatives at Risk for Plakophilin-2-Associated Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy.
Article in Circulation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.European heart journal · 2026Review
- Physical Activity in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy: From Trigger to Therapeutic Dilemma.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Yield of Family Screening in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Without a Validated Genetic Cause.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2026Article
- Bridging the Gap Between Genetic Cardiomyopathies and Pregnancy.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Body surface potential mapping of ventricular depolarization and repolarization in phospholamban and plakophilin-2 cardiomyopathy.Heart rhythm O2 · 2026Article
- Study design and rationale of the Visualizing Subclinical Myocardial Changes with Shear Wave Elastography in Dilated Cardiomyopathy (VISUALIZE-DCM) trial.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Prognostic Role of Myocarditis-Like Episodes and Their Treatment in Patients With Pathogenic Desmoplakin Variants.Circulation · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPenetrance and risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) are increasingly recognized as being genotype specific. Therefore, genotype-informed family screening protocols may lead to safer and more personalized recommendations than the current one-size-fits-all screening recommendations. We aimed to develop a safe, evidence-based plakophilin-2 (
methodsWe included 295 relatives (41% male; age 30.9 years [18.0-47.7 years]) with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic
resultsAt baseline, 110 relatives (37%) had definite ARVC. During 8.5 years (4.2-12.9 years) of follow-up, 62 of 185 relatives (34%) without definite ARVC at baseline progressed to definite ARVC diagnosis, and 35 of 295 of all relatives (12%) had VA. VAs occurred only in relatives who previously fulfilled definite ARVC diagnosis. Relatives with borderline ARVC (fulfillment of one minor criterion plus the major family history criterion) progressed 5 times faster in the multistate model to definite ARVC diagnosis and compared with genotype-positive/phenotype-negative (G+/P-) relatives (ie, major family history criterion alone). Relatives 20 to 40 years of age had increased risk for developing definite ARVC (hazard ratio, 2.23;
conclusionsAn evidence-based longitudinal screening algorithm that integrates age, symptoms, and baseline clinical phenotype may improve patient care and improve efficiency of clinical resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.