ArticleAnalytical chemistry2025
Overcoming Matrix Effects in Non-Target Screening: A Novel Strategy for Urban Runoff Analysis.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Suspect and Nontargeted Screening for Food Safety Testing: A Case Study of Bee Pollen Supplements.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Suspect Screening and Prioritization as an Analytical Strategy for the Identification of Persistent, Mobile, and Toxic (PMT) Substances in Surface Water.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Matrix effects (MEs) challenge the reliability of target and non-target screening (NTS) in urban runoff analysis, particularly due to sample heterogeneity, which makes pooled samples inadequate for method development, validation, and ME corrections. This study investigated MEs in 21 urban runoff samples from different catchment areas, showing high variability in signal suppression (0-67% median suppression at 50× relative enrichment factor, REF). Runoff collected after prolonged dry periods ("dirty" samples) required enrichment below REF 50 to avoid suppression exceeding 50%. In contrast, "clean" samples had suppression below 30% even at REF 100. To correct residual MEs, a novel Individual Sample-Matched Internal Standard (IS-MIS) strategy consistently outperformed established ME correction methods, achieving <20% RSD for 80% of features through analysis of samples at three REFs as part of the analytical sequence to match features and internal standards. In contrast, internal standard matching with a pooled sample resulted in only 70% of features meeting this threshold (<20% RSD). Although IS-MIS requires additional analysis time (59% more runs for the most cost-effective strategy), it significantly improves accuracy and reliability, making it a viable and cost-effective solution for large-scale urban runoff monitoring. Furthermore, IS-MIS generates valuable data on peak reliability through measurements of signal intensities across multiple REFs, which can be used to remove "false" peaks and improve data preprocessing and method development in NTS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.