ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2025
Patients Evaluated and Discharged From the Waiting Room Do Not Have a Higher Rate of 72-Hour Returns - A Retrospective Observational Study.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technological advancements and the use of key performance indicators in hospital management: a critical-conceptual review.Frontiers in health services · 2026Review
- Invited Editorial: Waiting Room Care is Not the Solution to Emergency Department Boarding.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the rate of return visits to the emergency department (ED) within 72 hours of discharge for patients evaluated in the waiting room. ED crowding challenges throughput, and we hypothesized that some patients may be suitable for the completion of evaluation without rooming. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective analysis of a tertiary hospital ED. The primary outcome was 72-hour returns following discharge from the ED, stratified by location of initial physician evaluation and discharge: waiting room only, waiting room followed by treatment space, and treatment space only. Categorical data were compared using a chi-squared test and continuous data using a one-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction. The primary outcome was analyzed using a chi-squared test adjusting for age, biologic sex, Emergency Severity Index, primary language, time of day, and day of the week using logistic regression. Results: There was a statistically significant overall difference in return visits within 72 hours of discharge based on the ED location where the evaluation occurred ( Conclusion: There was no significant increase in the rate of return for those patients seen primarily in the waiting room or for those where the initial work up started in the waiting room compared with those who were placed in a treatment space prior to a physician evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.