Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40525173›Full record

ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2025

Combining Robotic Navigational Bronchoscopy and Lung Resection Into a Single Anesthetic Event: Cost-Effectiveness, Wait Times, and Outcomes.

Lucas Weiser, Claire Perez, Justin J Watson, Kellie Knabe, Allen Razavi, Vikram Krishna, Charles Fuller, Sevannah Soukiasian, Andrew R Brownlee, Harmik J Soukiasian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lucas WeiserDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Claire PerezDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Justin J WatsonDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Kellie KnabeDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Allen RazaviDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Vikram KrishnaDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Charles FullerDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Sevannah SoukiasianDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Andrew R BrownleeDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Harmik J SoukiasianDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Delay from diagnosis to resection in non-small cell lung cancer negatively affects survival. Single-anesthesia robotic navigational bronchoscopy with biopsy and lung resection (SABR) was developed to mitigate delay. We report outcomes, wait times, and cost effectiveness of this approach vs staggered robotic navigational bronchoscopy followed by resection. Methods: Patients undergoing SABR or staggered biopsy and resection between April 2020 and May 2023 were included. Demographic and procedural characteristics were collected for both groups. Time from clinic and biopsy to operation, length of stay, and inpatient complications were captured. Direct, indirect, and total costs, adjusted to 2023 dollars, were measured for each case. Results: The study included 40 patients in the SABR group and 30 patients in the staggered group. Baseline clinical characteristics including pathologic stage were similar between the groups. No difference was found in rates of complications. Time from clinic to resection was 26.5 days in the SABR group and 41.5 days in the staggered group ( Conclusions: Our experience suggests that the SABR technique offers a significant reduction in the time from diagnosis to treatment as well as reduces cost of care for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Identifiers

PMID40525173
PMCPMC12167518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.