ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2025
Total Robotic Resection for Superior Sulcus Tumors: Technical Description and Case Series.
Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perioperative outcomes of extended robotic-assisted thoracic surgery with combined resection of adjacent structures.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Sequential robotic-assisted thoracic surgery and transmanubrial approach for optimal resection of superior sulcus tumor: a case report.Journal of visualized surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive superior sulcus tumor (SST) resections have been described, but have been limited to a hybrid approach. We describe our technique and experience of total robotic resection of SST with video. Methods: We performed a single-institutional retrospective review of the patients who underwent total robotic resection for SST from 2018 to 2023. Total robotic resection for SST was defined as the surgical resection of the lobe and chest wall by a total intracorporeal approach without chest wall resection through an additional incision. Results: During the study period, 7 of 19 patients (37%) with SST underwent induction therapy and proceeded to total robotic resection. Of these, 2 of the 7 cases (29%) were converted to open, and the other 5 (71%) were completed through a total robotic approach (right: n = 4, left: n = 1). No patients required chest wall reconstruction. There were no in-hospital or 90-day deaths, including the patients converted to open. Conclusions: Total robotic approach to SST appears feasible and safe, and our early data suggest outcomes similar to open approaches. Although offering a minimally invasive approach to these operations may decrease the morbidity of these operations, additional studies with longer-term follow-up and comparison with open series are required to understand the potential benefits and/or risks of these procedures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.