ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Assessing the healthfulness of pre-packaged beverages and investigating sugar thresholds for revising front-of-pack labels: a case study in Thailand.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A scoping review of assessment of front-of-pack labeling policy implementation and response in low-and middle-income countries.Public health nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thailand's implementation of the "Healthier Choice" logo (THCL) as a front-of-pack nutritional labeling (FOPNL) scheme aims to promote healthier consumer food choices. In response, the beverage industry has increasingly replaced nutritive sweeteners (NS) with non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) in their products. This study evaluates the energy and sugar content, sweetener usage, and overall healthfulness of pre-packaged beverages in Thai supermarkets, while also assessing their compliance with WHO "free sugar" consumption guidelines and exploring appropriate sugar thresholds for revising the THCL criteria. A cross-sectional audit was conducted in a major Bangkok supermarket between March and April 2022, collecting data on 881 pre-packaged beverages. To ensure a comprehensive evaluation, these beverages were further categorized based on product ingredients, THCL status, and sweetener type. Healthfulness was assessed using three validated nutrient profiling systems (NPS), and sugar threshold scenarios were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis and area under the curve metrics. The median energy and sugar content per 100 ml were 37.9 kcal (21.9-52.2) and 5.00 g (2.0-7.8), respectively. Overall, pre-packaged beverages in Thai supermarkets were predominantly classified as "less healthy," with 40.1% containing at least one NNS. Products carrying the THCL logo (27.7%) had lower energy and sugar content, indicating a "healthier" profile. However, these beverages also exhibited a higher prevalence of NNS compared to unlabeled products. Regardless of beverage type, consuming a typical bottle containing NS or a combination of NS and NNS in a single sitting often exceeded the WHO's recommended daily limit of 5% of total energy intake from free sugars. Thus, the study also proposes a phased approach to sugar reduction, initially lowering the sugar threshold to 5.0 g/100 ml, followed by a further reduction to 4.0 g/100 ml. In conclusion, the study underscores the widespread use of NNS in Thai pre-packaged beverages and identifies an overall "less healthy" nutritional profile across product categories. Reducing sugar content and implementing incremental sugar benchmarks in the THCL scheme are essential steps toward improving the healthfulness of pre-packaged beverages in Thailand and aligning these products more closely with WHO guidelines on sugar consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.