Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40525106›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Adapting the facial action coding system for chimpanzees (

Catia Correia-Caeiro, Paul Henrik Kuchenbuch, Linda S Oña, Franziska Wegdell, Maël Leroux, André Schuele, Jared Taglialatela, Simon Townsend, Martin Surbeck, Bridget M Waller and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Catia Correia-CaeiroHuman Biology & Primate Cognition, Institute of Biology, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Paul Henrik KuchenbuchIndependent Researcher, Berlin, Germany.
Linda S OñaHuman Biology & Primate Cognition, Institute of Biology, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Franziska WegdellDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Maël LerouxÉthologie Animale et Humaine (EthoS), CNRS, University of Rennes, Normandie University, Rennes, France.
André SchueleBerlin Zoo, Berlin, Germany.
Jared TaglialatelaApe Cognition and Conservation Initiative, Des Moines, IA, United States of America.
Simon TownsendDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Martin SurbeckDepartment of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Bridget M WallerDepartment of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Katja LiebalHuman Biology & Primate Cognition, Institute of Biology, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Facial Action Coding System (FACS) is a widely recognised coding scheme for analysing human facial behaviour, providing an objective method to quantify discrete movements associated with facial muscles, known as Action Units (AUs), and reducing subjective bias. FACS has been adapted for nine other taxa, including apes, macaques, and domestic animals, but not yet bonobos. To carry out cross species studies of facial behaviours within and beyond apes, it is essential to include bonobos. Hence, we aimed at adapting FACS for bonobos. We followed a similar methodology as in previous FACS adaptations: first, we examined the facial muscular plan of bonobos from previously published dissections. Given the similarity between bonobo and chimpanzee musculature, we tested if ChimpFACS for chimpanzees could be applied to bonobos. Second, we used ChimpFACS to analyse spontaneous facial behaviour in bonobos through videos recorded in various contexts. Third, we noted any differences in appearance changes between the AUs included in ChimpFACS and the AUs observed in bonobos. Our findings showed that bonobos exhibit all the facial movements observed in chimpanzees, and thus ChimpFACS can reliably be applied to bonobos. Bonobos presented a diverse repertoire of 28 facial movements (22 AUs, three Action Descriptors, and three Ear Action Descriptors). Although the range of facial movement is lower than in humans, bonobo's potential for facial movement is comparable to that of chimpanzees, underscoring the significance of this behaviour modality during social interactions for both species. The ChimpFACS Extension for bonobos is an objective coding scheme for measuring facial movements in bonobos, designed to be used in conjunction with ChimpFACS. This coding scheme extension will allow us to better understand bonobos' behaviour and communication, with practical applications for assessing their welfare, particularly in human care. It also provides a framework for comparing primate species, contributing to insights into the origin and evolution of facial emotion and communication.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalFaceFacial ExpressionFacial MusclesPan paniscusPan troglodytesAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleVideo RecordingAnatomyBonobosCommunicationFaceFacial expressionsFacial movementsFACSHomologyMethodologyObservational tool

Identifiers

PMID40525106
PMCPMC12169169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.