Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40525084›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2025

Haleema Tariq, Sowmyalakshmi Subramanian, Anja Geitmann, Donald L Smith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. MultifunctionalJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Novel Lytic Podovirus AP-20-A InfectingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Integrative Exploration ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Combined effects of earthworms andFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The mechanism ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haleema TariqDepartment of Plant Science, McGill University, QC, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Sowmyalakshmi SubramanianDepartment of Plant Science, McGill University, QC, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Anja GeitmannDepartment of Plant Science, McGill University, QC, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Donald L SmithDepartment of Plant Science, McGill University, QC, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many agrochemicals designed to help plants withstand abiotic and biotic stresses can negatively impact the environment. Soil, as an essential natural resource, offers plants organic matter, nutrients, and microbial diversity to thrive in challenging environmental conditions. The soil contains plant growth-promoting bacteria that play an important role in plant/crop productivity, assisting plants through a variety of mechanisms, including nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, phytohormone production, induction of resistance against a wide range of pathogens, and production of microbe-to-plant signals that regulate aspects of plant responses to stress. Plant growth-promoting bacteria such as

Indexed as

BacilluscannabisPaenibacillusplant growthplant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB)soybean

Identifiers

PMID40525084
PMCPMC12169014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.