ArticleCureus2025
Incidental Diagnosis of Uterine Perforation During Lower Segment Caesarean Section: A Rare Obstetric Complication.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case report describes the incidental finding of uterine perforation during lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) in a 30-year-old woman, G2A1 with a history of a missed abortion. The antenatal period of the current pregnancy was uncomplicated. The patient presented at 39 weeks with complaints of leaking. A detailed examination revealed thick meconium, leading to the diagnosis of premature rupture of membranes. In response to the urgency posed by potential fetal distress, an emergency LSCS was performed. Post-delivery, an incidental intraoperative finding revealed a 2 cm circular uterine perforation at the fundus, actively bleeding. Swift surgical intervention utilizing absorbable suture polyglactin 2.0 achieved successful hemostasis, preventing potential severe complications such as postpartum endometritis and peritonitis. This case highlights the importance of vigilance and prompt intervention in managing unexpected obstetric complications during LSCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.