ArticleCureus2025
Bullet to the Heart: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Penetrating cardiac injuries (PCI) from gunshot wounds are among the most fatal forms of trauma, with prehospital mortality rates exceeding 90%. While the right ventricle is most commonly affected due to its anterior location, retained intracardiac projectiles are rarely encountered and pose significant management challenges. Cardiac tamponade, though potentially fatal, can sometimes provide a protective mechanism by limiting hemorrhage. The decision to surgically remove retained bullets remains controversial, particularly in hemodynamically stable patients. We report the case of a 51-year-old male who sustained multiple gunshot wounds, including a thoracic injury with an 8 mm bullet fragment retained in the right ventricle. On arrival, the patient was hemodynamically stable despite imaging revealing a pericardial effusion and a sternal fracture. A median sternotomy with pericardiotomy was performed, revealing a right ventricular epicardial wound without active bleeding. Due to the absence of cardiopulmonary bypass, the intracardiac bullet was not removed. The patient received prophylactic heparin and was monitored with imaging and serial exams. He was discharged without complications. This case highlights a rare presentation of PCI without overt tamponade physiology, despite the presence of a pericardial effusion. The patient remained stable throughout hospitalization, supporting the hypothesis that tamponade can temporarily contain hemorrhage. Conservative management of retained intracardiac projectiles may be appropriate in select patients, particularly when the projectile is embedded in the trabeculated myocardium and the risk of embolization is low. Literature suggests that long-term outcomes can be favorable with nonoperative management in stable cases. This case reinforces the importance of rapid surgical intervention for PCI, even in stable patients, and supports individualized, conservative management of retained cardiac projectiles in the absence of cardiopulmonary bypass. Further research is needed to define standardized protocols for managing intracardiac foreign bodies in trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.