ReviewCureus2025
Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Spasticity in Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Literature Review of Treatment Protocols and Outcome Measurement Parameters.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Electrotherapy in Pediatric Rehabilitation: A Structured Narrative Review of Clinical Applications, Treatment Parameters, Safety, and Evidence Gaps.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This literature review investigates the therapeutic potential of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy (rESWT) for managing spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (CP), with a focus on its clinical efficacy, safety profile, and implications for functional rehabilitation. Synthesizing findings from six randomized controlled trials, the review reveals that rESWT consistently produces statistically significant reductions in spasticity, as measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), along with notable improvements in gross motor function, joint range of motion, gait symmetry, plantar contact area, and manual dexterity. These benefits were maintained for varying durations, with some studies demonstrating sustained effects for up to 12 weeks post-treatment. Importantly, rESWT was well-tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported across all included studies, highlighting its safety and feasibility in pediatric populations. Despite the consistent reporting of positive outcomes, considerable heterogeneity exists in treatment protocols, target muscle groups, outcome measurement timing, and reporting of participant characteristics, which complicates direct comparisons and limits the generalizability of findings. The review also emphasizes the need for incorporating multidimensional outcome domains, including those related to posture, balance, and gross motor performance, in future studies to better reflect real-world functional gains. Although promising, the current evidence base remains constrained by methodological inconsistencies and limited use of objective assessment tools. To optimize clinical application, future research should aim to standardize rESWT protocols, extend follow-up periods, and incorporate validated biomechanical and functional performance assessments. Collectively, these findings support rESWT as a non-invasive, clinically effective, and safe adjunct to conventional therapies in pediatric neurorehabilitation, with the potential to enhance both motor and functional outcomes in children with CP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.