ArticleAfrican journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence2025
Perceptions, availability and use of vasopressors for septic shock in emergency care settings in Tanzania.
Article in African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adrenaline vs noradrenaline: Equity, context, and the realities of best practice.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis carries a disproportionately high mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa. Current international guidelines for management of septic shock advocate for initial fluid resuscitation followed by vasopressors if there is ongoing concern for hypoperfusion. Emerging data suggest patients in sub-Saharan Africa who receives large fluid boluses may have increased mortality and thus earlier initiation of vasopressors may have clinical benefit. Little data exists on the perceptions, availability and use of vasopressors in Tanzania, which may impact the feasibility of this strategy. We aimed to describe the perception, availability and use of vasopressor in Tanzanian emergency care settings, including its barriers. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional web-based survey among clinicians and nurses from 19 different hospitals throughout Tanzania (national, zonal, regional and district hospitals). Collected data was kept by the principal investigator on a password encrypted computer whereby descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results. Results: Sixty-five healthcare providers completed the survey of whom the majority 53 (81.5 %), work in the emergency medicine department and 50 (76.9 %) reported treating at least one patient with septic shock per week. However, three quarters of respondents from district hospitals and nearly half of those from regional hospitals had access to vasopressors in <50 % of the time. The most common reported barriers to vasopressor use were lack of availability (50.8 %), and lack of comfort or knowledge (43.1 %). Overall, most respondents perceived that vasopressor use is generally safe and helpful for treating septic shock. Conclusions: Nearly all Tanzanian healthcare providers in emergency care settings reported that they had limited access to vasopressors to treat septic shock, as it was not consistently available. In addition to unavailability, lack of knowledge on vasopressor use was also reported as barrier. Our findings suggest that ensuring availability of vasopressors and education in the use thereof would improve sepsis care in Tanzanian hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.