ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Character and Personality Perception and Social Trait Judgment After Facial Surgical and Medical Aesthetic Interventions.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The outcome of aesthetic surgical or medical interventions is typically reported from the patient's or surgeon's perspective. However, facial cosmetic interventions have the potential to influence perceived personality traits. How these interventions affect personality perception remains largely underappreciated. Facial inferences are a third perspective still missing from the plastic surgery literature. Methods: A PICO (patient, population or problem; intervention; comparison, outcome) literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase databases. Results: Facial rejuvenation procedures in women confer a large societal benefit. Patients experience enhanced perceived femininity, attractiveness, social skills, and likeability. In men, the procedures are not as gender-enhancing, but some may experience improvements in perceived attractiveness, likeability, social skills, and trustworthiness. Clear improvement in sociability, capability, trustworthiness, attractiveness, and health is observed after blepharoplasty and brow lift in both sexes. In female patients, rhinoplasty has favorable changes in femininity and in both the warmth and competence domains. It does not, however, significantly change the perception of masculinity in male patients. Conclusions: Insight into how aesthetic interventions change observers' perception provides an additional dimension to our understanding about their true benefits as perceived by society. Patients must be made aware that as much as it is essential for them to be satisfied with their appearance, how they are judged and perceived by others is just as important.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.