ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2025
Prospective Evaluation of a Novel Unidirectional Permanent Device for Intraoperative Brachytherapy.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: The CivaSheet is a novel radiation delivery device consisting of unidirectionally shielded Pd-103 sources embedded in a bioabsorbable polymer sheet. This facilitates intraoperative placement of permanent brachytherapy seeds in a surgical tumor bed, while minimizing dose to overlying structures. No clinical trial data have yet been published for this device. We prospectively investigated its feasibility as an alternative to standard intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT). Methods and Materials: This was a prospective study in patients with abdomopelvic malignancies undergoing surgery with an indication for IORT. Prior external beam radiation was allowed. The primary endpoint was feasibility, defined as technically satisfactory placement of CivaSheet in ≥7 of 10 patients. Secondary endpoints were adverse events, local control, and implant stability. Results: Ten patients were enrolled and underwent surgery. Eight patients successfully underwent CivaSheet implantation. The 2 feasibility exclusions were technically unfavorable based on intraoperative assessment of tumor bed configuration. All implanted patients were treated to the pelvic sidewall or presacral space with a median prescription dose of 100 Gy. Median follow-up from the date of implant was 25 months. One patient had a marginal recurrence 3 months after implant, and 1 patient recurred at implant site after 13 months. One and 2-year estimates of local control were 86% and 69%, respectively. No device-related grade 4-5 adverse events were observed. Postimplant stability was deemed satisfactory in all patients. Conclusions: This is the first published clinical trial of a novel unidirectional brachytherapy device. CivaSheet proved to be a feasible technique to deliver intraoperative radiation to patients with high-risk pelvic malignancies after surgical resection, and warrants further study and clinical consideration, particularly in settings where other IORT options are not available.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.