Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40524836›Full record

ArticleJournal of migration and health2025

Migrant workers' access to medical service providers in Pennsylvania.

Philip Decicco, Jaya Prakash, Erica Nelson, Gonzalo Martínez de Vedia, Hanni Stoklosa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of migration and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Philip DeciccoJustice at Work, USA.
Jaya PrakashHEAL Trafficking, Harvard Medical School, USA.
Erica NelsonJustice at Work, USA.
Gonzalo Martínez de VediaSolidarity Center, USA.
Hanni StoklosaHEAL Trafficking; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard Medical School.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The H-2A Temporary Agricultural Workers program brings hundreds of thousands of foreign workers into the United States to work in the agricultural sector each year. It is well documented that H-2A workers are susceptible and subjected to unsafe working conditions and other workplace abuses. Employed in the agricultural sector, H-2A workers are exposed to higher rates of workplace hazards and riskier workplace settings, including risk for human trafficking. As foreign-born workers living on the same farms in which they are employed, they face language and information barriers when accessing resources outside of those provided by their employer. All these factors contribute to creating significant barriers for H-2A workers when accessing healthcare. This paper uses ArcGIS software and publicly available information to analyze the proximity and accessibility of healthcare resources to H-2A workers in Pennsylvania. We find that less than half of H-2A workers in Pennsylvania in 2021 resided within a 15-minute drive of the types of healthcare providers best suited to address their particular needs. We also posit that this methodology could be used in the future to better allocate and prioritize resources to create intervention points and address the unique needs of this at-risk worker population, including health care interventions for human trafficking victims.

Indexed as

Geospatial analysisH2A workersHealth disparitiesHuman traffickingLabor traffickingMigrant workers

Identifiers

PMID40524836
PMCPMC12167828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.