ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Risk of cardiovascular disease among cancer survivors: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Age at Iatrogenic Menopause and Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2026Pooled it
- Cardiovascular risk-prediction models in cancer survivors: a meta-analysis.European heart journal · 2026Pooled it
- Frailty and risk of common chronic diseases among cancer survivors: a prospective cohort study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Review
- Cardiovascular Phenotypes Across Major Cancer Types: Distribution and Association with All-Cause Mortality in a Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Persistent Cardiovascular Burden and Independent Association Among Cancer Survivors in the United States, 2016 to 2024.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Co-Design and Pilot Testing of a Nurse-Led GP-Supported Self-Management Intervention for Breast Cancer Survivors with Cardiovascular Diseases: A Study Protocol.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Article
- Venous thromboembolism in China: epidemiology, management strategies, and future directions.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Review
- Review
- A smartphone application for cardiovascular rehabilitation in cancer survivors.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Metabolic and inflammatory biomarker trajectories after a cancer diagnosis and the risk of cardiovascular diseases.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Prognostic Impact of Cancer in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Population-Based Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- When Cancer Survival Improves, the Heart Becomes the Next Frontier.Korean circulation journal · 2026Article
- Observational
- Performance of Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Scores and Objective Optimization in Cancer Survivors.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Factors Among Cancer Patients: 5-Year National Inpatient Sample Analysis.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Arterial stiffness in long-term breast cancer survivors: a propensity score-matched analysis in primary prevention.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Coronary artery calcification burden in cancer vs. non-cancer populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Association of the C-reactive protein-triglyceride-glucose index with the risk of incident cardiovascular disease in rectal cancer survivors.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There have been conflicting studies on the associations between cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The hypothesis of this meta-analysis was to investigate whether cancer survivors had an increased risk of CVD compared to those without cancer based on population-based cohort studies. Methods: We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective cohort studies. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus published in any language from January 1, 1990 to February 24, 2025. We included cancer survivors and non-cancer controls. The primary outcome was the risk of CVD. The secondary outcomes included 17 CVD subtypes (e.g., ischemic heart, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vascular disease). Effect estimates (hazards ratios, HRs) with 95% CIs were pooled. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses and meta-regression were performed to explore the stability of the results and the sources of heterogeneity. The protocol of this review was registered in PROSPERO: CRD42024559349. Findings: A total of 160 population-based cohort studies involving 49,395,865 participants (9,092,869 cancer survivors vs. 40,302,996 non-cancer controls) were identified. Overall, the HR for CVD in cancer survivors was 1.47 [95% CI, 1.33-1.62] compared with that in non-cancer controls. Cancer increased the risk of all 17 CVD subtypes, with cancer having the greatest effect on venous embolism, thrombosis or thrombophlebitis (HR, 3.07 [2.03-4.65]) and the least on ischemic heart disease (HR, 1.13 [1.03-1.24]). The increased risk of CVD was consistently shown in cancer survivors of brain, hematological, respiratory, male genital, and breast cancers, whereas no significant higher CVD risk was observed for other cancer types. Elevated risk of CVD was consistently shown in subgroup analyses of study design, age at cancer diagnosis, sex, location, follow-up duration, control, disease diagnosis, and therapy. Male and younger cancer survivors had elevated risk of CVD than female and older cancer survivors. Interpretation: This meta-analysis provides an up-to-date comprehensive global overview that cancer survivors had increased risk of CVD and 17 CVD subtypes than non-cancer controls. CVD risk evaluation and management need to be prioritized in cancer survivors, particularly among male, younger, and specific cancer survivors (brain, hematological, respiratory, male genital, and breast). This study provides supporting evidence that may inform future updates to guidelines for CVD prevention in cancer survivors, highlighting its public health relevance. Funding: The National Key R&D Program of China, the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.