Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40524797›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Real-world uptake of nirsevimab, RSV maternal vaccine, and RSV vaccines for older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Daira Trusinska, Bohee Lee, Sohail Ferdous, Harley H Y Kwok, Becky Gordon, Junyi Gao, Liantao Ma, Hanbiao Xiong, Sir Aziz Sheikh, Jürgen Schwarze and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Daira TrusinskaUsher Institute, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Bohee LeeNational Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Sohail FerdousUsher Institute, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Harley H Y KwokSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Becky GordonUsher Institute, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Junyi GaoUsher Institute, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Liantao MaNational Engineering Research Center for Software Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Hanbiao XiongNational Engineering Research Center for Software Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Sir Aziz SheikhUsher Institute, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Jürgen SchwarzeChild Life and Health, Centre for Inflammation Research, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, The University of Edinburgh, UK.
John BusbyCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast School of Medicine Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Belfast, UK.
Cheryl GibbonsVaccination and Immunisation Division, Clinical and Protecting Health Directorate, Public Health Scotland, UK.
Simon B DrysdaleOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sir Lewis RitchieAcademic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, UK.
Thomas WilliamsChild Life and Health, Centre for Inflammation Research, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, The University of Edinburgh, UK.
Ting ShiUsher Institute, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In clinical trials, recently introduced respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) immunisation products have shown high efficacy in preventing severe RSV outcomes. Implementing successful immunisation programmes is however key to realising these benefits in real-world settings. We aimed to investigate uptake of the long-acting monoclonal antibody nirsevimab, the RSV maternal vaccine, and RSV vaccines for older adults in countries where immunisation programmes have been introduced, and to explore how uptake varies between countries and population subgroups. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we carried out four monthly searches in Medline, Embase, and Global Health databases for studies reporting uptake of nirsevimab, the RSV maternal vaccine, and RSV vaccines for older adults. We included population-based studies published between December 1, 2022 and February 5, 2025. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and completed a risk of bias assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tools. We assessed uptake stratified by country and socio-demographic and clinical subgroups. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects modelling. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42025643585. Findings: We screened a total of 1267 studies, 43 of which met the inclusion criteria reporting data on over 1.38 million individuals from six countries. Nirsevimab uptake data were reported in 34 studies: 16 from Spain, eight from the United States, seven from France, one with combined data from Andorra and Spain, and one from each of Italy and Luxembourg. Our pooled estimates showed that nirsevimab uptake on population level was 90.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 86.4-92.9) in Spain and 51.2% (95% CI: 29.3-72.7) in the United States during the 2023/24 RSV season. Uptake data for the RSV maternal vaccine and RSV vaccines for older adults were reported in five and eight studies, respectively, all from the United States. Meta-analysis showed population-level uptake of 30.5% (95% CI: 20.6-42.6) and 18.2% (95% CI: 10.8-28.9), respectively. Uptake varied across subgroups. Interpretation: Uptake of nirsevimab varied substantially between the countries that have implemented infant RSV immunisation programmes. Despite the limited number of studies and the lack of more accurate data at national level the low uptake estimates for RSV maternal vaccine and RSV vaccines for older adults are concerning. National, clinical, and public health initiatives are needed to increase uptake of RSV immunisation products and ensure maximum benefit to people currently at risk of severe RSV outcomes. Funding: Health Data Research UK, Inflammation and Immunity Driver Programme.

Indexed as

Immunisation programmesNirsevimabRespiratory syncytial virus (RSV)RSV vaccinesVaccine uptake

Identifiers

PMID40524797
PMCPMC12167775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.