Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40524760›Full record

ArticleJournal of developmental and physical disabilities2025

Communication Modality Preference and the Social Validity of Functional Communication and Mand Training.

Joel E Ringdahl, Kelly M Schieltz, Matthew J O'Brien, Jennifer J McComas, Rose M Morlino, Karla A Zabala-Snow, Emily K Unholz-Bowden, Shawn N Girtler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of developmental and physical disabilities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joel E RingdahlCenter for Autism and Behavioral Education Research, University of Georgia, Athens, GE, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4282-5150
Kelly M SchieltzThe University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7335-0624
Matthew J O'BrienThe University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9096-3585
Jennifer J McComasUniversity of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9539-7079
Rose M MorlinoCenter for Autism and Behavioral Education Research, University of Georgia, Athens, GE, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1368-1813
Karla A Zabala-SnowCenter for Autism and Behavioral Education Research, University of Georgia, Athens, GE, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5399-1686
Emily K Unholz-BowdenUniversity of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0924-9518
Shawn N GirtlerUniversity of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6698-3685

Funding

Harnessing Communication Preferences to Enhance Its Persistence and Mitigate Relapse of Challenging BehaviorR01HD069377 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI Joel Ringdahl, Kelly Michele Schieltz · 2012 to 2026
$4.6M
Developing an Intervention Model for Complex Communication Needs in Rett SyndromeR21DC015021 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MCCOMAS, JENNIFER J · 2016 to 2017
$402k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069377NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC015021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers have shown that behavioral interventions that incorporate communication as a focus have demonstrated efficacy for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). Researchers have demonstrated that individuals with IDD allocate responding to one communicative response modality over others when multiple communicative modalities produce reinforcement in the context of a concurrent-schedules arrangement. Identifying preference for communicative response modality provides one approach to incorporating aspects of social validity in the design of behavioral interventions for individuals with IDD, placing additional importance on demonstrations of the robustness of this preference. In the current study, we evaluated preference among concurrently available communication modalities for 14 individuals with IDD. Results of the study replicated previous, similar research in that the vast majority of individuals demonstrated a preference between communicative response modalities. We discuss the results within the context of social validity and implications for intervention.

Indexed as

Autism spectrum disorderFunctional communication trainingIntellectual disabilityPreferenceSocial validity

Identifiers

PMID40524760
PMCPMC12169889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.