Trial reportBrain communications2025
Voices of patients' relatives to support weaning from mechanical ventilation: a randomized trial.
Trial report in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Best Available Evidence on Weaning and Extubation in Mechanically Ventilated Neurocritical Care Patients: An Evidence Summary.Nursing in critical care · 2026Review
- The Effect of Family Voice Interventions on Delirium Incidence and Duration in Adult ICU Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nursing in critical care · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Weaning from mechanical ventilation is complicated in patients with severe brain injury, but recurrent stimulation by familiar voices and commands to breathe in and out during critical weaning periods may improve patient outcomes. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, safety and efficacy of audio recordings of patients' relatives to support weaning from mechanical ventilation. VOICE-WEANING II (Voices of patients' relatives to support weaning from mechanical ventilation) was a randomized (1:1), sham-controlled clinical trial. Patients aged 18 years and older with controlled mechanical ventilation ≥ 48 h due to neurological disease were included. Patients received either audio recordings or sham control with muted audio recordings for 10 min, three times per day from initiation of assisted mechanical ventilation. The primary outcome was rate of weaning failure. Secondary outcomes included duration of controlled ventilation, rate of tracheostomy, delirium and all-cause mortality at 90 days. Brain activity was assessed using spectral density analysis of continuous electroencephalogram monitoring. Fourty-five participants were randomized (25 males/20 females, median age 60 years). Of those, 22 patients received audio recordings (48.9%) and 23 (51.1%) sham control. Rate of weaning failure was 52.4% in the intervention group and 63.6% in the control group (adjusted difference -9.5; 95% confidence interval, -38.8 to 19.9;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.