Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40524757›Full record

Trial reportBrain communications2025

Voices of patients' relatives to support weaning from mechanical ventilation: a randomized trial.

Maximilian I Sprügel, Marie-Louise Isenberg, Jochen A Sembill, Tamara M Welte, Rüdiger Hopfengärtner, Stefanie Balk, Kosmas Macha, Anne Mrochen, Lena Rühl, Franziska Panier and 7 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Maximilian I SprügelUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Neurologische Klinik, 91054 Erlangen, Bayern, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1679-9553
Marie-Louise IsenbergUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Neurologische Klinik, 91054 Erlangen, Bayern, Germany.
Jochen A SembillUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Neurologische Klinik, 91054 Erlangen, Bayern, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0014-3389
Tamara M WelteUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Neurologische Klinik, 91054 Erlangen, Bayern, Germany.
Rüdiger HopfengärtnerUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Neurologische Klinik, 91054 Erlangen, Bayern, Germany.
Stefanie BalkUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Neurologische Klinik, 91054 Erlangen, Bayern, Germany.
Kosmas MachaUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Neurologische Klinik, 91054 Erlangen, Bayern, Germany.
Anne MrochenUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Neurologische Klinik, 91054 Erlangen, Bayern, Germany.
Lena RühlUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Neurologische Klinik, 91054 Erlangen, Bayern, Germany.
Franziska PanierUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Neurologische Klinik, 91054 Erlangen, Bayern, Germany.
Luise BiburgerUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Neurologische Klinik, 91054 Erlangen, Bayern, Germany.
Tobias HeckelsmüllerUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Neurologische Klinik, 91054 Erlangen, Bayern, Germany.
Lisa DietmarUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Neurologische Klinik, 91054 Erlangen, Bayern, Germany.
Markus PrinzUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Neurologische Klinik, 91054 Erlangen, Bayern, Germany.
Stefan SchwabUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Neurologische Klinik, 91054 Erlangen, Bayern, Germany.
Hagen B HuttnerUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Neurologische Klinik, 91054 Erlangen, Bayern, Germany.
Joji B KuramatsuUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Neurologische Klinik, 91054 Erlangen, Bayern, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weaning from mechanical ventilation is complicated in patients with severe brain injury, but recurrent stimulation by familiar voices and commands to breathe in and out during critical weaning periods may improve patient outcomes. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, safety and efficacy of audio recordings of patients' relatives to support weaning from mechanical ventilation. VOICE-WEANING II (Voices of patients' relatives to support weaning from mechanical ventilation) was a randomized (1:1), sham-controlled clinical trial. Patients aged 18 years and older with controlled mechanical ventilation ≥ 48 h due to neurological disease were included. Patients received either audio recordings or sham control with muted audio recordings for 10 min, three times per day from initiation of assisted mechanical ventilation. The primary outcome was rate of weaning failure. Secondary outcomes included duration of controlled ventilation, rate of tracheostomy, delirium and all-cause mortality at 90 days. Brain activity was assessed using spectral density analysis of continuous electroencephalogram monitoring. Fourty-five participants were randomized (25 males/20 females, median age 60 years). Of those, 22 patients received audio recordings (48.9%) and 23 (51.1%) sham control. Rate of weaning failure was 52.4% in the intervention group and 63.6% in the control group (adjusted difference -9.5; 95% confidence interval, -38.8 to 19.9;

Indexed as

brain injuriescritical carefamily supportventilationweaning

Identifiers

PMID40524757
PMCPMC12168123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.