Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40524741›Full record

ArticlePain reports2025

Establishing the patient acceptable symptom state for patient-reported pain outcomes 6 months after breast cancer surgery.

Matthew Kang, David Rice, Nuala Helsby, Andrew Somogyi, Michal Kluger, Daniel Chiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew KangDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Health New Zealand, Te Whatu Ora Waitemata, Auckland, New Zealand.
David RiceDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Health New Zealand, Te Whatu Ora Waitemata, Auckland, New Zealand.
Nuala HelsbyDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Andrew SomogyiDiscipline of Pharmacology, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Michal KlugerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Health New Zealand, Te Whatu Ora Waitemata, Auckland, New Zealand.
Daniel ChiangDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Health New Zealand, Te Whatu Ora Waitemata, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3394-1993

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) is a threshold score on patient-reported outcome measures beyond which patients consider their symptoms unacceptable (PASS negative). The PASS may guide the interpretation of outcomes associated with persistent pain after breast cancer surgery (PPBCS). Objectives: This study aimed to identify PASS cut-off values for the numerical rating scale (NRS) on the brief pain inventory (BPI) items for pain at 6 months after breast cancer surgery and describe functional and psychological outcomes associated with an unacceptable (PASS-negative) pain state. Methods: This prospective cohort study included patients undergoing primary breast cancer surgery. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 weeks and 6 months using validated questionnaires. Patient-acceptable symptom state was evaluated at 6 months after surgery. Patients were classified into PASS-positive (acceptable pain state) or PASS-negative groups using a pain-specific anchor question. Patient-acceptable symptom state thresholds for the BPI items were determined using the Youden index on a receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: Of the 140 included patients, 13.6% reported a PASS-negative state at 6 months after surgery. Compared to PASS-positive patients, PASS-negative patients reported greater pain severity, pain interference, psychological distress, upper limb disability, and neuropathic pain (all Conclusion: The NRS scores for the BPI worst pain >1.5, average pain >0.5, and pain interference >0.8 delineated patients with "unacceptable" PPBCS. These values may define clinically meaningful PPBCS and offer pain cut-off values for research.

Indexed as

Breast cancerImpactPatient acceptable symptom statePersistent painRisk factorsSurgery

Identifiers

PMID40524741
PMCPMC12169963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.