Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40524739›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025

Real-time target localization on 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging linac orthogonal cine images using transfer learning.

Yiling Wang, Elia Lombardo, Jie Wang, Yu Fan, Yue Zhao, Stefanie Corradini, Claus Belka, Marco Riboldi, Christopher Kurz, Guillaume Landry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yiling WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Elia LombardoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jie WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yu FanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yue ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Stefanie CorradiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Claus BelkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marco RiboldiDepartment of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Garching, Germany.
Christopher KurzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Guillaume LandryDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Deep learning-based tumor tracking is promising for real-time magnetic-resonance-imaging (MRI)-guided radiotherapy. We investigate the applicability of a tumor tracking model developed for 0.35 T MRI-linac sagittal cine-MRI for 1.5 T interleaved orthogonal cine-MRI and implement transfer learning to further improve its performance. Materials and methods: We collected 3600 cine-MRI frames in sagittal, coronal and axial planes from 24 patients (validation 10, testing 14) treated on a 1.5 T MRI-linac, where two expert clinicians manually segmented target labels. A transformer-based deformation model trained on 0.35T MRI-linac images (baseline model, BL) was evaluated and used as a starting point to train patient-specific (PS) models. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the surface distance (50th and 95th percentiles, SD50%, SD95%) were used to compare the obtained target segmentations with the ground truth labels. The percentage of negative Jacobian determinant values (NegJ), accounting for the folding pixel ratio, was determined. Results: Outperformed by all the PS models, the BL model averaged in a DSC of 0.85, SD50% of 1.9 mm, SD95% of 5.9 mm and NegJ of 0.45 % in testing. The best PS model averaged in a DSC of 0.90, SD50% of 1.3 mm, SD95% of 3.9 mm and NegJ of 0.02 % in testing. Conclusion: We have found the 0.35 T model trained on sagittal cine-MRIs cannot be directly applied to a 1.5 T interleaved orthogonal cine-MRI system. However, PS transfer learning could improve the target tracking performance and reach an accuracy comparable to the inter-observer variability.

Identifiers

PMID40524739
PMCPMC12169715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.