Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40524706›Full record

ArticleAJOG global reports2025

Effectiveness of expanded prenatal screening among consanguineous couples of Afghan descent.

Noura Osman, Laila Rhee, Nina Boe, Herman Hedriana, Krishna Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJOG global reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Noura OsmanUC Davis Health Prenatal Diagnosis of Northern California, Sacramento, CA (Osman, Rhee, Boe, Hedriana, and Singh).
Laila RheeUC Davis Health Prenatal Diagnosis of Northern California, Sacramento, CA (Osman, Rhee, Boe, Hedriana, and Singh).
Nina BoeUC Davis Health Prenatal Diagnosis of Northern California, Sacramento, CA (Osman, Rhee, Boe, Hedriana, and Singh).
Herman HedrianaUC Davis Health Prenatal Diagnosis of Northern California, Sacramento, CA (Osman, Rhee, Boe, Hedriana, and Singh).
Krishna SinghUC Davis Health Prenatal Diagnosis of Northern California, Sacramento, CA (Osman, Rhee, Boe, Hedriana, and Singh).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The American College of Medical Genetics recommends extensive carrier screening among consanguineous couples, yet limited information is available regarding its performance among specific populations. We describe the potential utility of a large expanded carrier screening panel (>500 genes) for Afghan couples with consanguinity. Method: A retrospective chart review was conducted of all patients who reported consanguinity and had genetic counseling consultation between 2010 and 2021 at our institution. Results: Thirty-six women of Afghan descent reported consanguinity. Nineteen (53%) did not have known autosomal recessive disease risk (no prior fetus/child with suspected syndrome), 11 (31%) had apparent disease risk (fetus/child with symptoms suggesting syndrome but no specific diagnosis), and six (17%) had known molecular diagnosis for a prior child with a recessive syndrome. Of the six women with known molecular diagnosis for prior child with syndrome, five had known pathogenic variants confirming a genetic disorder, and one had highly suspicious variant of uncertain significance in the family. Among these six, five (83%) could have been identified with a 787-gene prenatal carrier screening panel. Conclusion: Large, expanded carrier screening panel appears to be an effective method for identifying disorders among consanguineous Afghan couples and should ideally be considered preconceptionally.

Indexed as

delivery of caregenetic counselingprenatal diagnosissingle gene disorderssociological

Identifiers

PMID40524706
PMCPMC12167801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.