ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2025
Ischemia-free liver transplantation improves long-term outcomes in a 5-year follow-up study.
Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simplified ischemia-free liver transplantation with continuous normothermic machine perfusion.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Ischemia-free Liver Transplantation: 7-y Experience From a Single-center Cohort in China.Transplantation · 2026Article
- TM9SF1 Aggravates Liver Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury by Promoting Autophagy.Inflammation · 2026Article
- Propensity Score-matched Real-world Data: HCC Recurrence Rates After DBD Liver Transplantation in Times of Machine Perfusion.Transplantation direct · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & Aims: Ischemia-free liver transplantation (IFLT) is a novel technique designed to avoid ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Here, we report the first detailed 5-year follow-up outcomes. Methods: We conducted a cohort study comparing long-term outcomes between IFLT and conventional liver transplantation (CLT) recipients of livers donated after brain death (DBD). The primary objective was to evaluate 5-year patient and graft survival. Additional endpoints included graft loss, biliary complications, rejection, infections, and liver-related laboratory tests. Subgroup analysis was performed to validate the generalizability of the results in patients with pre-transplant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Results: A total of 168 patients were enrolled, with 38 patients in the IFLT group and 130 patients in the CLT group. Five-year patient survival (86.84% Conclusions: Long-term (5-year) follow-up data demonstrate that the use of IFLT potentially improves both patient and graft survival, when compared with CLT, in transplantation of brain-dead donor livers. Impact and implications: Ischemia-free liver transplantation (IFLT) has emerged as a new approach designed to avoid IRI throughout all episodes of the transplant procedure. It has been confirmed that the use of IFLT can substantially reduce early-onset graft IRI-related complications. In this first 5-year follow-up study on the IFLT technique, we demonstrate that, compared with conventional liver transplantation, IFLT can potentially improve long-term patient and graft survival by reducing cancer recurrence. This new technique has the potential to change current clinical practice, particularly in the use of marginal grafts and in patients with HCC. Clinical Trials registration: chictr.org (ChiCTR-OPN-17012090).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.