ArticleEuropean urology open science2025
Robot-assisted Management of Complex Ureteral Stenosis in Kidney Transplant Patients: Multicenter Case Series and Description of Surgical Techniques.
Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robot-assisted urologic surgery after kidney transplantation: indications, graft-protection strategies, and outcomes-a scoping review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted vesical mucosal graft ureteroplasty: a novel technique using an autologous tissue substitute for ureteral reconstruction.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Advancing urological practice: the value of combined antegrade and retrograde ureterography for the management of complex ureteral strictures.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted ureteral reimplantation using the KangDuo surgical Robot-01 system: a prospective, single-center, single-arm pilot study.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Robot-assisted third kidney transplantation in a patient with exhausted iliac fossae: A case report.Therapeutic advances in urologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Ureteral stenosis following renal transplantation can occur in up to 10% of patients. Initial management, after kidney drainage, may include endoscopic balloon dilation ± laser incision. In case of recurrence after a primary endourological approach, strictures >1-3 cm, or complex anatomy in transplant patients, ureteral reconstruction should be performed. A robotic approach may reduce morbidity in this fragile population. We describe our case series of robot-assisted surgical treatments for ureteral stenosis in kidney transplant patients. Methods and surgical procedure: We included 29 renal transplant patients who suffered from ureteral stenosis in whom ureteral reconstruction was performed at three referral centers from November 2019 to March 2024. Different approaches were used: ureteroneocystostomy (with or without an antireflux tunnel or a Boari flap), ureteroureterostomy, and pyeloureterostomy using the native ureter (ipsilateral or contralateral). Key findings and limitations: All cases were performed using the Da Vinci Xi robotic system and completed successfully without intraoperative complications. The median pre- and postoperative (3 mo) glomerular filtration rates were 45 (interquartile range [IQR] 31-60) and 46 (IQR 31-58) ml/min, respectively. The median hospital stay was 4 (IQR 3-6) d. Postoperative complications were limited (21% Clavien-Dindo ≤2 and 10% Clavien-Dindo ≥3). Of 29 patients, 28 (97%) were free from nephrostomy or JJ stent at a median follow-up of 18 (IQR 13-34) mo. Our retrospective findings advocate confirmation through prospective data. Conclusions: We demonstrate the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction in kidney transplant patients with ureteral stenosis, allowing high-quality realignment of the urinary tract, quick recovery with a low complication rate, and good preservation of renal function in this fragile population. Patient summary: We demonstrate several robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction options for kidney transplant patients suffering from ureteral stenosis. We found these techniques to be safe and effective, with low complication rates and good preservation of the renal function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.