ArticleAnaesthesiology intensive therapy2025
An analysis of cases referred to Polish prosecutor's offices involving suspected medical errors directly and indirectly connected with the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Anaesthesiology intensive therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe healthcare system is one of the areas most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland. This resulted in a higher occurrence of medical errors at diffe-rent stages of diagnosis and patient treatment. This study aimed to determine how the COVID-19 pandemic affected the number and type of medical errors in Poland and the type of medical facility where the irregularity occurred. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe reviewed inquiries into the correctness of medical proceedings related to COVID-19; these were received by our department from prosecutor's offices throughout Poland during the pandemic and after its end: from the beginning of January 2020 to the end of December 2023. During the examined period (48 months), the department received a total of 4,483 inquiries, i.e. approximately 4.5 per day (approximately 1,000 working days). Of these, 293 were related to the COVID-19 pandemic (6.54%) and were further analyzed according to the selected criteria. Inquiries regarding "COVID" cases concerned all aspects of medical procedures, all medical professions, and all healthcare entities.
resultsA clear correlation was found: most inquiries raising doubts about the correctness of medical procedures were received during the peaks (waves) of the pandemic: autumn 2020, spring 2021, late autumn 2021, and winter 2021/2022.
conclusionsDespite the introduction of legal regulations intended to decriminalize consequences of medical errors related to the COVID-19 pandemic, such cases were still submitted to prosecutors' offices; prosecutors initiated proceedings and then commissioned expert opinions on the correctness of the medical procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.