Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40524635›Full record

GuidelineAnnals of laboratory medicine2025

Standards and Practice Guidelines for Venous Blood Collection: Consensus Recommendations from the Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine.

Jeonghyun Chang, Sooin Choi, Hanwool Cho, Sollip Kim, Jae-Woo Chung, Soo Jin Yoo, Eun Young Song, Sail Chun, Working Group on Venous Blood Collection Guideline of the Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jeonghyun ChangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7928-7195
Sooin ChoiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4746-4809
Hanwool ChoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5956-480X
Sollip KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0474-5897
Jae-Woo ChungDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4867-9708
Soo Jin YooDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1715-3487
Eun Young SongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1286-9611
Sail ChunDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5792-973X
Working Group on Venous Blood Collection Guideline of the Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-quality specimens are essential for accurate laboratory results. Preanalytical errors due to issues, such as hemolysis, microclotting, and insufficient specimen volume, account for 60%-70% of laboratory errors and frequently result from improper blood collection techniques or negligence during the collection process. Therefore, standardized blood collection guidelines and continuous education are required. In Korea, standardized venous blood collection procedures have not yet been fully established, highlighting the need for an evidence-based protocol tailored to local requirements. The venous blood collection guideline presented here was adapted from international standards to conform to globally recognized practices and address the Korean clinical context. The guideline, developed by the Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine, outlines the critical steps in venous blood collection, from patient identification and consent to post-collection handling. Practical recommendations are provided for medical students, doctors, nurses, and medical technologists. The guideline addresses specific considerations for pediatric and older patients, as well as individuals undergoing blood culture tests, with an emphasis on minimizing errors and promoting the safety of patients and medical staff. The guideline includes practical tools, such as checklists and detailed information on sampling devices, to facilitate implementation. This initiative would help standardize blood collection practices, improve specimen quality, and enhance patient care by ensuring accurate laboratory results in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Blood Specimen CollectionPhlebotomyConsensusHumansRepublic of KoreaSocieties, MedicalBlood collectionBlood samplingPractice guidelineSampling deviceVenipunctureVenous blood

Identifiers

PMID40524635
PMCPMC12187494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.