GuidelineAnnals of laboratory medicine2025
Standards and Practice Guidelines for Venous Blood Collection: Consensus Recommendations from the Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine.
Guideline in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Essential Data Elements for Laboratory Test Interoperability: An Expert Consensus-Based Framework.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2026Guideline
- Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Serum Separator Tubes and Transport Systems on Hormone and Tumor Marker Measurements.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2026Article
- Fasting Duration and Differences Across Routine Laboratory Tests.JAMA internal medicine · 2026Article
- From Detection to Decision Support: Advancing AI-Assisted Serum Quality Assessment.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2026Article
- Protein S Levels to Guide Exon-Level Copy Number Variant Analysis ofAnnals of laboratory medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Effects of Multicomponent and Multiprofessional Interventions on Cardiovascular and Functional Health in Hypertensive and Normotensive Older Women: A Case Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Effect of water intake on routine laboratory test parameters in healthy adults: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Factors associated with anemia among adolescent girls in Western India: insights from a multi-centric cross-sectional study.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- Klinefelter Syndrome Identified by Next-generation Sequencing as a Risk Factor for Venous Thromboembolism: A Single-institution Study.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2026Article
- Assessing anemia burden and multifactorial contributors among pregnant women in Gujarat: a cross-sectional study integrating biochemical, nutritional, and geographic disparities.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-quality specimens are essential for accurate laboratory results. Preanalytical errors due to issues, such as hemolysis, microclotting, and insufficient specimen volume, account for 60%-70% of laboratory errors and frequently result from improper blood collection techniques or negligence during the collection process. Therefore, standardized blood collection guidelines and continuous education are required. In Korea, standardized venous blood collection procedures have not yet been fully established, highlighting the need for an evidence-based protocol tailored to local requirements. The venous blood collection guideline presented here was adapted from international standards to conform to globally recognized practices and address the Korean clinical context. The guideline, developed by the Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine, outlines the critical steps in venous blood collection, from patient identification and consent to post-collection handling. Practical recommendations are provided for medical students, doctors, nurses, and medical technologists. The guideline addresses specific considerations for pediatric and older patients, as well as individuals undergoing blood culture tests, with an emphasis on minimizing errors and promoting the safety of patients and medical staff. The guideline includes practical tools, such as checklists and detailed information on sampling devices, to facilitate implementation. This initiative would help standardize blood collection practices, improve specimen quality, and enhance patient care by ensuring accurate laboratory results in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.