ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026
Successful Retention Strategies for Nurses in Home Visiting Nursing Services: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nurse Managers' Decisions About Work Schedules-Dealing With Conflicting Priorities: A Case Study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Successful Retention Strategies for Nurses in Home Visiting Nursing Services: A Scoping Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Experience and Perceptions of Retention Strategies in District Nursing Services: A Web-Based Mixed Methods Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo identify successful strategies and underpinning mechanisms for retaining nurses in home visiting nursing services.
designScoping review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Theses Global Databases (1 January 2000 to 23 November 2023); international nursing organisations websites (January-April 2024). REVIEW
methodsThe methods followed the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance. Two researchers independently screened and reviewed, with disagreements resolved through discussion. Included papers were analysed for underlying mechanisms.
resultsOf 1219 records identified, seven met the criteria. Four papers reported senior administrators' experience of successful multiple types of strategies (unspecified), but none reported retention outcomes. Three papers reported evaluations of initiatives providing clinical and peer support to nurses new to home visiting nursing. All three papers reported improved retention rates at 12 months in comparison to the year previous, although there was no consideration of other potentially influencing factors. We identified eight underlying mechanisms in the seven papers: (1) finance incentives; (2) work schedule flexibility for individuals; (3) team level management; (4) positive feedback on job performance; (5) team level interpersonal relationships; (6) the work organisation and resources; (7) support to individual's development in knowledge, clinical skill and confidence and (8) participation in organisation's decision making.
conclusionThis review identified noticeable few papers over a time when all countries have been trying to address the growing health needs of the older populations. The gap in evidence as to the most effective combinations of retention strategies for home visiting nursing requires urgent attention. Clinical leaders and managers require evidence to inform their strategies for retaining home visiting nurses in order to provide high quality care as more health care systems increase the provision of acute, chronic, and palliative care in patients' own homes. REPORTING
methodThis paper conforms to PRISMA reporting guidelines for scoping reviews. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.