Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40524483›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2025

Variable Flip Angle Optimization for Fetal Brain Imaging With Reduced Specific Absorption Rate.

Dominique Franson, Camilo Calixto, Hongli Fan, Camilo Jaimes, Clemente Velasco-Annis, Suely Fazio Ferraciolli, Cesar Alves, Edward Yang, Stephen Cauley, Ali Gholipour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dominique FransonSiemens Medical Solutions USA Inc, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9870-3147
Camilo CalixtoDepartment of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Hongli FanSiemens Medical Solutions USA Inc, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Camilo JaimesHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Clemente Velasco-AnnisDepartment of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Suely Fazio FerraciolliHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Cesar AlvesDepartment of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Edward YangDepartment of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Stephen CauleySiemens Medical Solutions USA Inc, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ali GholipourDepartment of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Next-generation in-vivo fetal neuroimagingR01EB031849 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI GHOLIPOUR-BABOLI, ALI · 2021 to 2024
$2.2M
Acquisition of a Siemens 3T MRI for Research ImagingS10OD025111 · OD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI WARFIELD, SIMON K · 2018 to 2018
$2.0M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB031849NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB031849NIH HHS S10 OD025111Office of the Director of the NIH S10OD025111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Half-Fourier Acquisition with Single-Shot Turbo Spin Echo (HASTE) scans are routinely used for fetal brain imaging, but they have a high specific absorption rate (SAR) and can be inefficient due to SAR limits. Here, we have designed an optimized variable flip angle (VFA) pattern for fetal HASTE neuroimaging to reduce both the SAR and repetition time (TR) of the HASTE sequence while maintaining similar image quality to standard fetal HASTE imaging with a constant flip angle (CFA). The VFA pattern was optimized by minimizing the difference in expected signal between the VFA and CFA scans while constraining the SAR of the VFA scan to no more than 65% of the SAR of the CFA scan and reducing the TR by 29%. The expected signal was calculated using an extended phase graph formalism, and simulations were used to predict the performance of the two scans using different image quality metrics. The proposed VFA and standard CFA scans were tested in phantoms and fetuses at 3 T. SAR and acquisition times were recorded, and image quality was rated by three radiologists. The VFA scan showed similar signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio values but slightly lower signal and relative contrast values than the CFA scan in phantom studies. In vivo, the VFA scan yielded significantly reduced SAR, measurement times, and total scan times. There was no significant difference in overall image quality ratings between the VFA and CFA scans. An optimized VFA scan can provide 65% of the SAR and 71% of the acquisition time of a CFA scan while being diagnostically equivalent. Lower SAR reduces heating, eliminates SAR pauses, and allows accelerated scans by reducing the TR. The time saved by faster HASTE acquisitions increases patient comfort and may be used to repeat scans with excessive fetal motion or to perform advanced sequences.

Indexed as

BrainFetusMagnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansPhantoms, ImagingPregnancySignal-To-Noise Ratiofetal brainfetal MRIHASTEsingle‐shot turbo spin echospecific absorption ratevariable flip angle

Identifiers

PMID40524483
PMCPMC13156923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.