ArticleBritish journal of haematology2025
Can we identify individuals at risk to develop multiple myeloma? A machine learning-based predictive model.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated abstraction of clinical parameters of multiple myeloma from real-world clinical notes using large language models.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Shaping the future of multiple myeloma with artificial intelligence and digital twins: from concept to clinic.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Can we identify individuals at risk to develop multiple myeloma? A machine learning-based predictive model.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
- Challenges, Difficulties, and Delayed Diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple myeloma evolves unnoticed over years, and when diagnosed, organ damage is common. Electronic health records (EHR) can help in developing predictive models identifying 'healthy' people at risk. MM patients from Clalit Health Services (2002-2019) were matched with healthy controls. Stage I: EHR from 5 years prior to MM diagnosis were reviewed and >200 parameters were compared (patients vs. controls). Stage II: Establishing xgboost model predicting 5 year risk for MM, with validation. Stage III: A simplified logistic regression model for community, requiring 20 variables (Age; Hb; RBC; MCV; RDW; WBC; neutrophils; lymphocytes; monocytes; basophils; glucose; creatinine; total protein; albumin; calcium; uric acid; bilirubin; HDL-C; LDL-C; triglycerides). EHR from the pre-MM period of 4256 patients were compared to controls. Future MM patients had higher ESR, lower Hb, ANC, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, higher globulins and ferritin, more immune deficiencies, MDS and FMF. They took fewer tranquilizers, anti-diabetics and statins. Using labs from future MM (n = 19 129) and controls (n = 382 580, 20:1), a predictive model was developed (ROC AUC = 0.836). The simple LR model provided individual risk prediction for MM within 5 years (AUC = 0.72). Two models with machine learning predict the risk of myeloma in 'healthy' individuals within 5 years. The models can be used in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.