Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40524448›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of haematology2026

Simplified Molecular International Prognostic Index as an eligibility criterion for clinical trials: Analysis of the Turkish Lymphoma Study Group's large B-cell lymphoma cohort.

Umut Yılmaz, Esra Terzi Demirsoy, Fatma Keklik Karadağ, Uğur Hatipoğlu, Meral Uluköylü Mengüç, Ebru Pekgüç, Taner Tan, Eda Nuhoğlu Kantarcı, Metban Mastanzade, Ali Durdu and 15 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Umut YılmazDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University - Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8672-0679
Esra Terzi DemirsoyDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Fatma Keklik KaradağDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.
Uğur HatipoğluDepartment of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation/Apheresis Unit, University of Health Science, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Meral Uluköylü MengüçDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ebru PekgüçDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, VKV American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Taner TanDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8096-8585
Eda Nuhoğlu KantarcıDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University - Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Metban MastanzadeDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ali DurduDepartment of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation/Apheresis Unit, University of Health Science, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Merve Apaydın KayerDepartment of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation/Apheresis Unit, University of Health Science, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Murat ÖzbalakDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Tuğrul ElverdiDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University - Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Asu Fergün YılmazDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Deniz GörenDepartment of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial Şişli Hospital, Haliç University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Tayfur ToptaşDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Turgay UlaşDepartment of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation/Apheresis Unit, University of Health Science, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9332-663X
Özgür MehtapDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5603-1178
Mehmet Sinan DalDepartment of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation/Apheresis Unit, University of Health Science, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Olga Meltem AkayDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Muhlis Cem ArDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University - Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Güray SaydamDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.
Fevzi AltuntaşDepartment of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation/Apheresis Unit, University of Health Science, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Elif Birtaş AteşoğluDepartment of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Burhan FerhanoğluDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4257-549X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative first-line trials in large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) have mostly failed over the last decade. Failures were commonly attributed to overestimation of the progression risk for the control arms, bringing the precision of the international prognostic index (IPI) into scrutiny. Simplified molecular IPI (smIPI), introduced at American Society of Hematology 2023, was developed to address the shortcomings of IPI. This study investigated smIPI and its potential implications as trial eligibility criteria among a multicentre LBCL cohort of 1439 patients. Patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2024 were included. Data were collected from institutional archives. The primary end-point was risk stratification for progression-free survival (PFS). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used for survival analyses. The smIPI reclassified 38.2% and 5.3% of patients to higher and lower risk groups from IPI, respectively. Patients reclassified to higher risk groups by smIPI had an increased risk of progression than the rest of the group (hazard ratio = 1.34, p = 0.003). High-risk groups classified by IPI and smIPI had similar outcomes (3-year PFS 54.9% vs. 56.3%); however, the high-risk group size was expanded by 35.2% when defined by smIPI. The smIPI is easily applicable and more sensitive than IPI in identifying patients under high risk of progression who are ideal candidates to participate in clinical research.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overClinical Trials as TopicCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisTurkeyBCL‐2clinical trialslymphomasnon‐Hodgkin lymphomaprognostic factors

Identifiers

PMID40524448
PMCPMC12819096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.