Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40524372›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2025

Discordant experiences of food insecurity within households in Cameroon: an examination of data from the 2018 Demographic and Health Surveys.

Caroline E Owens, Zhenan An, Craig Hadley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Caroline E OwensFood is Medicine Institute, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7041-1671
Zhenan AnDepartment of Quantitative Theory and Methods, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Craig HadleyDepartment of Quantitative Theory and Methods, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the degree to which cohabiting couples (men and women) in Cameroon responded differently to the Food Insecurity Experience Scale and, where discordance exists, to test hypothesised drivers of difference.

designThis cross-sectional study employed descriptive statistics and multivariable regression analyses using R.

settingNationally representative sample of cohabiting adults in Cameroon.

participants2889 couples (male/female; 5778 total adults) from the Cameroon Demographic and Health Survey (2018) couples recode.

resultsFood insecurity was more prevalent and reported with higher severity among men compared with women. Discordance in reported food insecurity was evident in 57-79 % of cohabiting couples in the dataset, depending on the measure used. Discordance was not clearly associated with household wealth. Further, among couples with discordant food insecurity experiences, men more often affirmed items that their partners did not affirm. Contrary to our hypotheses, items reflecting

conclusionsThis study highlights the importance of examining intrahousehold differences in food security. Understanding how individuals within a household experience and perceive their food situation and the underlying factors driving disparities is crucial for improving the effectiveness of targeted food and nutrition policies.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsFood InsecurityFood SupplyAdolescentAdultCameroonCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultFood securityGenderHouseholdsUrbanicityWealth

Identifiers

PMID40524372
PMCPMC12392347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.