Trial reportBritish journal of haematology2025
Efficacy and safety of oral decitabine/cedazuridine in the chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia subpopulations from phase 2 and 3 studies.
Trial report in British journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of oral decitabine/cedazuridine in the chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia subpopulations from phase 2 and 3 studies.British journal of haematology · 2025Trial
- Evaluating response criteria in myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Blood neoplasia · 2026Article
- Real-World Management of HMA-Related Myelosuppression During MDS Treatment in the Canadian Landscape.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Molecular devolution in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia during treatment with decitabine/cedazuridine: A case report.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Concomitant plasma cell myeloma and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in elderly: diagnostic complexity, therapeutic challenges - case report and literature review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTis) are commonly used in treating chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML); however, data from prospective studies of DNMTis in CMML are limited. The present analysis evaluated the efficacy, safety and pharmacodynamics of the oral DNMTi decitabine/cedazuridine in the subset of patients with CMML from the phase 2 and 3 trials, which led to the approval of this agent for myelodysplastic syndromes and CMML in the United States and Canada. Potential prognostic factors also were analysed. In all, 34 patients with CMML were screened and 33 were treated. Most patients (76% [n = 25]) had myelodysplastic type-CMML and 77% (n = 24/31 with DNA available for sequencing) had intermediate-2 or high-risk disease noted by CMML-specific prognostic scoring systems. The overall response rate was 76%, with 21% (n = 7) of patients achieving a complete response. Nearly half of the 11 patients who were red blood cell-transfusion dependent at baseline (46%) attained transfusion independence for ≥12 weeks, which was associated with survival. Median overall and transformation-free survival were 35.7 and 28.3 months, respectively, and the safety profile was similar to that previously reported for decitabine. This analysis described the use of decitabine/cedazuridine in CMML from consecutive, prospective, randomised trials and illustrated a median survival of nearly 3 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.