Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40524338›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of haematology2025

Efficacy and safety of oral decitabine/cedazuridine in the chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia subpopulations from phase 2 and 3 studies.

Michael R Savona, Olatoyosi Odenike, Gail J Roboz, Harshad Amin, Amy E DeZern, Elizabeth A Griffiths, Kim-Hien Dao, Amer M Zeidan, Bhavana Bhatnagar, Rena Buckstein and 7 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Michael R SavonaVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3763-5504
Olatoyosi OdenikeUniversity of Chicago and the University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Gail J RobozWeill Cornell Medicine and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Harshad AminBRCR Global, Plantation, Florida, USA.
Amy E DeZernThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Elizabeth A GriffithsRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Kim-Hien DaoOregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Amer M ZeidanYale University and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7017-8160
Bhavana BhatnagarWVU Cancer Institute at Wheeling Hospital, Wheeling, West Virginia, USA.
Rena BucksteinSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9520-7386
Brian LeberMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Mary-Margaret KeatingQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Somedeb BallVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Aram OganesianTaiho Oncology, Inc., Pleasanton, California, USA.
Yuri SanoTaiho Oncology, Inc., Pleasanton, California, USA.
Harold N KeerTaiho Oncology, Inc., Pleasanton, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0753-4921
Guillermo Garcia-ManeroThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3631-2482

Funding

Taiho Oncology, Inc.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTis) are commonly used in treating chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML); however, data from prospective studies of DNMTis in CMML are limited. The present analysis evaluated the efficacy, safety and pharmacodynamics of the oral DNMTi decitabine/cedazuridine in the subset of patients with CMML from the phase 2 and 3 trials, which led to the approval of this agent for myelodysplastic syndromes and CMML in the United States and Canada. Potential prognostic factors also were analysed. In all, 34 patients with CMML were screened and 33 were treated. Most patients (76% [n = 25]) had myelodysplastic type-CMML and 77% (n = 24/31 with DNA available for sequencing) had intermediate-2 or high-risk disease noted by CMML-specific prognostic scoring systems. The overall response rate was 76%, with 21% (n = 7) of patients achieving a complete response. Nearly half of the 11 patients who were red blood cell-transfusion dependent at baseline (46%) attained transfusion independence for ≥12 weeks, which was associated with survival. Median overall and transformation-free survival were 35.7 and 28.3 months, respectively, and the safety profile was similar to that previously reported for decitabine. This analysis described the use of decitabine/cedazuridine in CMML from consecutive, prospective, randomised trials and illustrated a median survival of nearly 3 years.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsLeukemia, Myelomonocytic, ChronicUridineAdministration, OralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDecitabineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomecedazuridineDecitabineUridinechronic myelomonocytic leukaemiadecitabine/cedazuridineDNA methyltransferase inhibitorshypomethylating agentsprognostic factors

Identifiers

PMID40524338
PMCPMC12378960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.