ReviewAsia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology2026
A New Dawn-Using Teletrials for Early Phase Drug Development: A Practical Guideline.
Review in Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A New Dawn-Using Teletrials for Early Phase Drug Development: A Practical Guideline.Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAccess to early-phase cancer clinical trials is heavily skewed toward urban patients treated at tertiary centers, creating significant inequity for regional/rural (R/R) populations. For early drug development (EDD) trials, travel requirements are a major barrier to R/R participation. Growing public and governmental policy pressure on pharmaceutical stakeholders and trial centers has driven the exploration of innovative solutions to improve access. Among these, the teletrial model, which has been effective in later-phase studies, presents an opportunity to address recruitment challenges in phase 1 trials. This article provides practical guidelines for implementing teletrials in EDD. METHODS/
resultsThis review outlines key operational, regulatory, and logistical considerations for phase 1 teletrials, covering site evaluation, ethics and governance, resource allocation, and funding models. Several teletrial frameworks are presented, tailored to the varying capabilities of satellite sites and the complexities of early-phase trials. Lessons learned from successful pilot initiatives are integrated into the recommendations to help guide site conversion and trial design. DISCUSSION: Phase 1 teletrials are a necessary evolution in clinical trial conduct, driven by increasing demands for equitable access to life-saving therapies. Challenges, including resource-intensive set-up, cost management, and oversight requirements, are acknowledged. However, with proper planning and stakeholder collaboration, teletrials offer significant benefits: increased trial recruitment, improved R/R patient access, and reduced geographic disparities. The expansion of teletrials will be crucial for meeting the recruitment challenges posed by biomarker-driven and rare-disease studies while maintaining safety and scientific integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.