Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40524276›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025

Patients' experiences of barriers and facilitators with continuous positive airway pressure therapy in obstructive sleep apnoea - a qualitative interview study.

Karin Jeppesen, Anita Rabøl Good, Ilse Dall Dyrhaug, Marianne Bruun Johansen, Jette Primdahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Evaluating Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement Activity Within the 3DPiPPIn Trial: A Qualitative Exploration of Contributors' Perspectives on Their Impact.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Neuro-Ophthalmological Disorders Associated with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karin JeppesenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sydvang 1, Sønderborg, 6400, Denmark. karin.jeppesen@rsyd.dk.
Anita Rabøl GoodDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sydvang 1, Sønderborg, 6400, Denmark.
Ilse Dall DyrhaugDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sydvang 1, Sønderborg, 6400, Denmark.
Marianne Bruun JohansenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sydvang 1, Sønderborg, 6400, Denmark.
Jette PrimdahlDepartment of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea ranges from 6 to 17% in the general adult population. Untreated obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is associated with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, traffic accidents, and decreased quality of life. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is the gold standard for treating OSA. However, only approximately half of all treated patients succeed with this therapy. There is a lack of knowledge about the patient experience of CPAP treatment and the barriers and facilitators to successful CPAP treatment. The study aimed to explore how newly diagnosed patients with OSA experience receiving the diagnosis, their motivation for treatment, and essential factors for successful CPAP treatment.

methodsA qualitative design using individual semi-structured interviews was applied. Patients with successful (n = 10) and unsuccessful (n = 9) treatment were interviewed. Qualitative Content Analysis inspired by Graneheim and Lundman was used.

resultsThe analysis derived five themes: "Symptoms and thoughts about the diagnosis and CPAP treatment", "Expectations and personal resources are important for success", "The experience of problems and benefit from CPAP treatment", "Social impact of CPAP treatment" and "Information and support from the sleep clinic."

conclusionsNewly diagnosed patients with obstructive sleep apnoea describe barriers to successful CPAP treatment as lack of support from their partner and problems with the equipment. Important facilitators are positive expectations, partner support, and noticeable treatment effects. Early follow-up support, a biopsychosocial approach, and relatives' involvement in the sleep clinic consultations are needed to support patients toward successful CPAP treatment.

Indexed as

AdherenceApnoea-hypopnoea indexCPAPQualitative content analysisSemi-structuredSleep clinic

Identifiers

PMID40524276
PMCPMC12168316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.