Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40524269›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of medical research2025

Nanobiosensors for revolutionizing parasitic infections diagnosis: a critical review to improve global health with an update on future challenges prospect.

Soheil Sadr, Ashkan Hajjafari, Alireza Sazmand, Cinzia Santucciu, Giovanna Masala, Mahdi Soroushianfar, Shakiba Nazemian, Abbas Rahdar, Sadanand Pandey, Moez Guettari and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Epidemiological study and risk factors of equine (Parasite epidemiology and control · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Soheil SadrDepartment of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9068-0673
Ashkan HajjafariDepartment of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2849-9125
Alireza SazmandDepartment of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, 6517658978, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8450-2993
Cinzia SantucciuWOAH and NRL for Echinococcosis, Animal Health, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Della Sardegna, 07100, Sassari, Italy. cinzia.santucciu@izs-sardegna.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9699-3745
Giovanna MasalaWOAH and NRL for Echinococcosis, Animal Health, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Della Sardegna, 07100, Sassari, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5301-2580
Mahdi SoroushianfarFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2044-2339
Shakiba NazemianFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4721-3293
Abbas RahdarDepartment of Physics, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran. a.rahdar@uoz.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4766-9214
Sadanand PandeySchool of Bioengineering and Food Technology, Faculty of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University, Solan, 173229, Himachal Pradesh, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2065-897X
Moez GuettariPreparatory Institute for Engineering Studies of Tunis, Materials and Fluids, Laboratory LR19ES03, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.
Hassan BorjiDepartment of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. hborji@um.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4706-4995

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parasitic infections remain a serious public health issue globally, requiring prompt and precise diagnosis. Traditional diagnostic techniques, such as microscopic examinations, immunological methods, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and molecular tests, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), are standard tools for parasite identification. However, traditional methods are time-consuming and have less sensitivity and specificity than nanobiosensors. Hence, the current review aims to analyze the nanobiosensors in detecting globally important human parasites, i.e., Plasmodium, Leishmania, Echinococcus, Schistosoma, and Taenia, emphasizing their significance in the early detection and analyzing their future challenges. Nanobiosensors provide efficient, sensitive, and rapid diagnosis of parasites' antigens or genetic material using nanomaterials, such as nanowires, quantum dots (QDs), metallic nanoparticles, and carbon nanotubes, as well as identification of biomarkers, including excretory-secretory products and microRNAs. Nanobiosensors can utilize diverse nanomaterials such as gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) for the detection of Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 (PfHRP2) in Plasmodium, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) functionalized with anti-EgAgB antibodies for Echinococcus, and QDs labeled with DNA probes for the detection of Leishmania kDNA. Regarding Schistosoma, graphene oxide (GO)-based nanobiosensors with a soluble egg antigen (SEA) binding, and for Taenia, metallic nanobiosensors can detect parasites' biomarkers even at low concentrations. Challenges for using nanobiosensors in parasitic infection diagnosis include limitations in mass production, biological matrix interference, and the need for standardization. Development of multiplex nanobiosensors using polymer nanofibers or hybrid nanoparticles for simultaneous detection of multiple pathogens, along with integration of lab-on-a-chip technology for point-of-care (PoC) platforms, is an important future prospect that needs to be worked on. In conclusion, considering the rapidly ongoing advancement of nanobiosensors, it is expected that they will aid the detection, treatment, and management of parasitic infections by providing new avenues for early detection, improved treatment, and improved disease management in the future.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesNanotechnologyParasitic DiseasesAnimalsGlobal HealthHumansBiomarkersHelminthNanobiosensorsNanotechnologyParasitesProtozoa

Identifiers

PMID40524269
PMCPMC12168311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.