Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40524251›Full record

ArticleJournal of eating disorders2025

The relevance of cardiac and gastric interoception for disordered eating behavior.

Aline Tiemann, Julie Ortmann, Marius Rubo, Andrea H Meyer, Simone Munsch, Claus Vögele, Zoé van Dyck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aline TiemannDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Fribourg, Av. de L'Europe 20, 1700, Fribourg, Switzerland. aline.tiemann@unifr.ch.
Julie OrtmannDepartment of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, Institute for Health and Behaviour, University of Luxembourg, 2, place de l'Université, L-4365, Esch-Sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Marius RuboDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, Perception and Methodology, Institute of Psychology, University of Bern, Fabrikstrasse 8, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Andrea H MeyerDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Fribourg, Av. de L'Europe 20, 1700, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Simone MunschDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Fribourg, Av. de L'Europe 20, 1700, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Claus VögeleDepartment of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, Institute for Health and Behaviour, University of Luxembourg, 2, place de l'Université, L-4365, Esch-Sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Zoé van DyckDepartment of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, Institute for Health and Behaviour, University of Luxembourg, 2, place de l'Université, L-4365, Esch-Sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastric interoception (i.e., the perception of gastrointestinal signals such as hunger, satiety or nausea) in the context of eating has recently gained increasing research attention. Nevertheless, it remains poorly understood how different interoceptive dimensions (e.g., self-report) and organ systems (e.g., cardiac, gastric) relate to each other and to disordered eating behaviors such as emotional, external and restrained eating. We assessed multiple dimensions (behavioral, self-reported, and physiological) in the cardiac domain (interoceptive accuracy, interoceptive self-report, interoceptive insight and objective physiological state) and in the gastric domain (gastric interoceptive sensitivity, gastric attribution of interoceptive sensations, interoceptive self-report, interoceptive insight and objective physiological state). The first goal of this study was to examine the relationship between cardiac and gastric interoception measured via multiple dimensions (behavioral, self-reported, and physiological). The second goal was to investigate whether multidimensional gastric interoception was a more important predictor of emotional, external and restrained eating than multidimensional cardiac interoception.

methodsOur sample (n = 128) was predominantly female (n = 116), included healthy individuals (n = 87) and individuals with an eating disorder or sub-clinical eating disorder (n = 41). Instruments included a heartbeat counting task, the two-step Water Load Test, electrocardiogram, electrogastrogram and the Dutch-Eating Behaviour Questionnaire. We used correlation analysis, multiple regressions, and LASSO regressions. The final sample included in the multiple regression and LASSO regressions resulted in N = 89.

resultsResults showed cardiac and gastric interoception to be distinguishable, yet not to be entirely independent processes. Results further suggest gastric and not cardiac interoception to be the most important predictor of emotional, external and restrained eating. Specifically gastric attribution of interoceptive sensations played the most important role in all disordered eating behaviors.

conclusionsOur findings highlight the importance of the gastric system in the assessment and targeted treatment of disordered eating behaviors. Future research should consider adding additional interoceptive dimensions.

Indexed as

Cardiac interoceptionDisordered eating behaviorEmotional eatingExternal eatingGastric interoceptionInteroceptionMachine learningMultidimensionalRestrained eating

Identifiers

PMID40524251
PMCPMC12172253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.