Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40524239›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2025

Epigenetic silencing and CRISPR-mediated reactivation of tight junction protein claudin10b (CLDN10B) in renal cancer.

Sarah Arroyo Villora, Yufen Zhao, Paula Castellanos Silva, Alba A Hahn, Vivien Olanin, David Groll, Sandra Maurer, Vera Roetzer, Witold Szymanski, Tara Procida-Kowalski and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Bioinformatics and Wet-Lab-Based Pipeline IdentifiesInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Sarah Arroyo VilloraInstitute for Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff Ring 58, 35390, Giessen, Germany. sarah.arroyo-y-villora@gen.bio.uni-giessen.de.
Yufen ZhaoInstitute for Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff Ring 58, 35390, Giessen, Germany.
Paula Castellanos SilvaInstitute for Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff Ring 58, 35390, Giessen, Germany.
Alba A HahnInstitute for Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff Ring 58, 35390, Giessen, Germany.
Vivien OlaninInstitute for Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff Ring 58, 35390, Giessen, Germany.
David GrollInstitute for Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff Ring 58, 35390, Giessen, Germany.
Sandra MaurerInstitute for Molecular and Cellular Anatomy, University of Regensburg, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Vera RoetzerInstitute for Molecular and Cellular Anatomy, University of Regensburg, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Witold SzymanskiInstitute of Translational Proteomics & Core Facility Translational Proteomics, Biochemical/Pharmacological Centre, Philipps-University, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
Tara Procida-KowalskiPlatform for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Institute for Lung Health (ILH), Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Niklas PhilippDepartment of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Computer Science, University of Applied Sciences Mittelhessen, 35390, Giessen, Germany.
Aline KochCell Biology and Plant Biochemistry, Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Regensburg, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Marek BartkuhnPlatform for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Institute for Lung Health (ILH), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), University of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Johannes GraumannInstitute of Translational Proteomics & Core Facility Translational Proteomics, Biochemical/Pharmacological Centre, Philipps-University, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
Richard VolckmannAmsterdam UMC, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan KosterAmsterdam UMC, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Oliver RossbachInstitute of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology and Chemistry, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Denise SalzigInstitute of Bioprocess Engineering and Pharmaceutical Technology, University of Applied Sciences Mittelhessen, 35390, Giessen, Germany.
Reinhard DammannInstitute for Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff Ring 58, 35390, Giessen, Germany.
Cornelia SiggesDepartment of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Computer Science, University of Applied Sciences Mittelhessen, 35390, Giessen, Germany.
Jan HalbritterDepartment of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Silke HaerteisInstitute for Molecular and Cellular Anatomy, University of Regensburg, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Antje Maria RichterInstitute for Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff Ring 58, 35390, Giessen, Germany. antje.m.richter@gen.bio.uni-giessen.de.

Funding

BMBF 031B1232BFCMH Forschungscampus Mittelhessen 2023_1_01FCMH Forschungscampus Mittelhessen, 2024_1_02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe kidney's tubular system relies on cell polarity and tight junctions to maintain structure and function and disruptions contribute to diseases like cancer. Loss of tight junction proteins such as Claudins can actively contribute to tumorigenesis.

resultsWe aimed to identify biomarkers for renal carcinoma, after kidney transplantation and conventional kidney tumors. We identified the epigenetic silencing of the Claudin 10 gene isoform B (CLDN10B) through DNA hypermethylation in renal cancers, including clear cell (ccRCC), papillary (pRCC) and post-transplantation renal carcinoma (PT-ccRCC). In contrast, CLDN10A was hypomethylated in ccRCC and pRCC. Differential methylation of the isoforms discriminates RCC from other malignancies. The epigenetic alteration of CLDN10B significantly correlated with reduced patient survival and advanced tumor staging. CLDN10B overexpression or induction significantly inhibited migration, cell cycle progression, and cellular growth. Using a CRISPR-based epigenetic editing tool reactivated CLDN10B to its endogenous level using VP160 and TET1 by promoter demethylation and significantly demonstrated its tumor-suppressive effects in 2D and 3D cell models.

conclusionOur findings suggest that CLDN10B acts as a tumor suppressor, and its epigenetic regulation may represent a therapeutic target for RCC. Ultimately, understanding CLDN10B's regulation and function could provide new insights into renal cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellClaudinsKidney NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene SilencingHumansMaleMixed Function OxygenasesPromoter Regions, GeneticProto-Oncogene ProteinsTight Junctionsclaudin 10ClaudinsMixed Function OxygenasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsTET1 protein, humanCLDN10CRISPR-Cas9DNA (hyper)methylationEpigenetic editingRenal cell carcinoma (RCC)Tumor suppressor

Identifiers

PMID40524239
PMCPMC12172364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.