ArticleJournal of intensive care2025
Combination of C
Article in Journal of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Veno-arterial COIntensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
- ECMO in Refractory Septic Shock: Patient Selection, Timing and Hemodynamic Targets.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe ratio of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide content difference to arterial-to-venous oxygen content difference (C
methodsThis single-center, prospective, observational, cohort, exploratory, pilot study involved newly diagnosed patients with septic shock admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) between May 2023 and August 2024. We classified patients into four groups based on their C
results105 patients were included in the study. The 28-day mortality differed significantly among the four groups of patients (A:8.3%, B:19%, C:30%, and D:46.7%, p < 0.05). The Kaplan-Meier curves for the four groups revealed significant differences in the 28-day survival probabilities. (p = 0.014). Multivariate Cox regression revealed that the independent risk factors for 28-day mortality were age [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.05, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.02-1.09, p = 0.001], C
conclusionsThe combined assessment of C
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.