ArticlePlant methods2025
Comparative analysis of distinct phenotyping methods for assessing wheat resistance and pathogen virulence among Fusarium species causing head blight disease.
Article in Plant methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Susceptibility of Leaves from Commercially Important Ornamental Shrubs to Artificial Inoculation withLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biological control ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developing disease-resistant crops is a critical strategy for reducing chemical treatments and mitigating plant disease outbreaks, particularly amid global environmental changes. Fusarium head blight (FHB), caused by a complex of Fusarium species, is one of the most devastating cereal diseases, leading to significant economic losses and contamination of grain with harmful mycotoxins that threaten global cereal production and human health. The high variability in virulence within the complex of Fusarium spp and the lack of efficient high-throughput screening methods have impeded the development of resistant cultivars and made large-scale virulence testing labor-intensive and time-consuming. This study evaluates the efficacy of detached leaf, coleoptile, and seedling assays as high-throughput alternatives to the standard head infection assay for assessing the virulence of Fusarium species and differentiating wheat genotypes by resistance or susceptibility. Two near-isogenic wheat lines, one carrying FHB resistance loci and the other without, were used to assess the virulence of four Fusarium species. The seedling and coleoptile assays showed strong concordance with the traditional head infection assay, accurately reflecting differences in disease severity across Fusarium species and between wheat lines. Conversely, the detached leaf assay provided some differentiation among species but was inconsistent in identifying differences between plant genotypes. Across all assays, F. graminearum consistently exhibited the highest virulence, causing severe disease in leaves, stems, seedlings, and heads, while F. poae was the least virulent. Interestingly, F. culmorum and F. avenaceum displayed tissue-specific variability. These findings establish the coleoptile and seedling assays as rapid, high-throughput alternatives for breeding programs, accelerating the identification of FHB-resistant genotypes and reducing the reliance on the labor-intensive head assay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.