ReviewOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Blueprint for clinical N-of-1 strategies with off-label precision treatments in monogenic epilepsies.
Review in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Areas of research priorities in epilepsy: A position paper of the European Reference Network for Rare and Complex Epilepsies, EpiCARE.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- PAtient-Centric epilepsy clinical trIal model For Improved health outcomes using Cannabidiol (PACIFIC study)-a methodology for developing patient-centred clinical trials in rare epilepsy syndromes.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precision treatments for monogenic epilepsies, i.e. treatments that can at least partially reverse the biochemical consequences of a pathogenic gene variant, have been gradually emerging over the years. To date, however, information on the efficacy of these treatments is mostly based on case-reports and retrospective studies. As a result, utilisation of precision treatments often lack consistency and a pre-defined outcome monitoring plan. N-of-1 strategies in clinical care are pre-defined, individually tailored, repeated challenge-withdrawal therapeutic trials designed to assess the value of a treatment of interest for an individual. Despite their potential to improve clinical decision-making, N-of-1 strategies have been hampered by limited guidance on their implementation and lack of consensus on oversight procedures. To improve treatment selection for rare monogenic epilepsies, the PINPOINT initiative (Precision Treatments In MoNogenic EPilepsies: Observational Registry And N-of-1 Trial Recommendations) was set up as a collaborative effort within the European Reference Network for Rare and Complex Epilepsies. PINPOINT aims to develop recommendations for the design of N-of-1 strategies with off-label precision treatments for monogenic epilepsies. Using available N-of-1 trial manuals, different components of N-of-1 design were tailored to the context of epilepsy and oversight procedures were outlined. These efforts resulted in this guidance document-or blueprint for N-of-1 strategies for monogenic epilepsies in clinical care. This blueprint defines the characteristics of treatments and patients that would be suitable for N-of-1 strategies. Key principles for outcome measure selection, period duration and statistical analysis are defined. Consideration is given to interim assessment rules, which establish whether proceeding onto an additional treatment cycle is likely to provide significant advantages. Procedures for ethical oversight are proposed. This blueprint for N-of-1 strategies can be used as a basis for master protocols to optimise individualised clinical care in a standardised and consistent manner. We are confident that this document will provide physicians with the building blocks needed to elevate precision treatments for rare monogenic epilepsies out of their current landscape of inadequate evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.