ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2025
Discovery and validation of cell-free DNA methylation markers for specific diagnosis, differentiation from benign tumors, and prognosis of breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating DNA methylation biomarkers for breast cancer risk prediction using artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Biological basis and clinical translation prospects of circulating cell-free DNA in precision management of breast cancer (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Breast cancer detection via targeted enzymatic methyl sequencing of plasma cell-free DNA.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2026Article
- Early Cancer Detection: What's Going on and What's Next.MedComm · 2026Review
- Epidemiology, early detection, and management of breast cancer in China: A comprehensive review.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPlasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation is emerging as a non-invasive marker for various cancers. We aimed to identify specific methylation markers for diagnosis, differentiation from benign tumors, and prognosis of breast cancer (BC), which are essential for clinical decision-making yet seldom examined together.
methodsBC-specific methylation markers were identified using an in-house 850K dataset combined with large-scale publicly available 450 or 850K datasets. Multiplex digital droplet PCR (mddPCR) assays were developed to detect methylation in cfDNA from 201 BC patients, 83 healthy donors, and 71 individuals harboring benign tumors. Diagnostic and prognostic performance were evaluated using logistic and Cox regression models, respectively. The basic mechanism of a selected gene was explored through in vitro experiments.
resultsWe identified 21 BC-specific methylated CpG sites that distinguished BC from tumor-adjacent tissues with high diagnostic accuracy. In the cfDNA cohort, three mddPCR assays targeting eight markers achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.856 (95% CI = 0.814-0.898) for distinguishing BC from healthy controls, and 0.742 (95% CI = 0.684-0.801) for differentiating BC from benign tumors. Notably, combining these methylation markers with mammography and ultrasound improved diagnostic performance, resulting in an AUC of 0.898 (95% CI = 0.858-0.938) for differentiating BC from benign tumors. In the TCGA-BC dataset, prognostic model based on six sites was associated with poor overall survival prognosis (hazard ratio = 2.826, 95%CI: 1.841-4.338, p < 0.0001). In vitro experiments elucidated that FAM126A overexpression regulates BC cells malignant phenotypes.
conclusionsOur study demonstrated potential values of methylation-based markers in the detection and prognosis of BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.