ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Simple C-Flex Traction™ instead of traction table for supine intramedullary nailing of geriatric pertrochanteric fractures.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo compare operative efficiency and safety profiles between a novel C-Flex Traction™ and conventional traction systems during supine intramedullary nailing of geriatric pertrochanteric fractures.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 52 geriatric patients with pertrochanteric fractures treated between January 2021 and December 2023. Participants were allocated to two groups: conventional traction table (TT, n = 29) and C-Flex Traction™ (n = 23). Perioperative metrics assessed included workflow efficiency (positioning duration, operative time), intraoperative parameters (blood loss, fluoroscopy times), radiographic outcomes (reduction accuracy, implant positioning), and postoperative functional recovery (Harris Hip Score) with complication surveillance.
resultsThe cohorts demonstrated comparable baseline demographics and fracture patterns. Notably, the C-Flex Traction™ cohort exhibited a 50% reduction in preoperative workflow duration compared to conventional traction systems (15.0 ± 2.2 vs. 30.0 ± 2.8 min). No intergroup disparities emerged in operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, or radiographic outcomes (reduction quality: 87% vs. 86.2% anatomic alignment). A single traction-related complication (ankle pain) occurred in the TT group.
conclusionThe C-Flex Traction™ offers a novel alternative to conventional traction tables. By integrating dynamic, surgeon-controlled traction with fluoroscopic guidance, C-Flex Traction™ achieves anatomical reduction and stable fixation comparable to traditional methods while eliminating reliance on specialized equipment. Its streamlined workflow significantly reduces preoperative preparation time and surgical staffing demands, enhancing operational efficiency-particularly valuable in resource-constrained settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.